From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Imports / inclusion of s.el into Emacs Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 22:01:34 +0300 Message-ID: References: <0c88192c-3c33-46ed-95cb-b4c6928016e3@default> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="38846"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 Cc: Richard Stallman , Emacs developers , =?UTF-8?B?7KGw7ISx67mI?= , Eli Zaretskii , Drew Adams To: =?UTF-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= , Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue May 05 21:02:18 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jW2pd-0009zy-Ur for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 05 May 2020 21:02:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43850 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jW2pc-0006U3-Th for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 05 May 2020 15:02:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58638) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jW2p2-00064Q-LB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2020 15:01:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-x42e.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::42e]:43106) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jW2p1-0000wW-5s; Tue, 05 May 2020 15:01:40 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id i10so4006717wrv.10; Tue, 05 May 2020 12:01:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hRj/+34Av2A6R7FdS78vFiMwFP2HmcDRuaLrMc1stJs=; b=p0Li+kpfxh5NScmZirpzXhH5QceL/nv9qsS77hF/LHeaywphUeBXFqVJn2ydDPHwzv P5uEfkwMUwpg0z0urfbYQMlJJOymg3fOylhpbJJ7pLeCf90RSwezqZHs/IKk9cNoNm97 qTHrbXff9GMQ9Nfz6x4Gmeg26lhLwo23tTZT9fftuNE5Xh2+7DODWC0/uC1cbHrZOBzd U11PnQOI0taLmjLl1/4//cXHbn3PvZZoaduVfVrwi/86u8LZ98zQo49nhoIXMvsAe+LY AhmKGJaTqDgqnOQII3JMHYYIq4ZhPIZovL6y5iTbkxstT1pDHLlcYSOVaMPEpb0R7nDc LEMA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hRj/+34Av2A6R7FdS78vFiMwFP2HmcDRuaLrMc1stJs=; b=plpoNs8xfv3cwLBdKWV62YAR6EpZu3/dJLzKNPuX6NrdkpARzUK5Roooh+OTAb/RKL dLW9h8NlJ6a5Z3CXAUhEGlc74XMc5raAGZg7khi0VFeecSxeqO4pwvjTz53eTcUR+KXi hswInAys6yUPtU9k/4m2nHaADB2i8a7jQ1/zFASWaITVslR1MqeFTszoa/OmUIpRXb4f Q/NJve6qa96BmGT79dKpWHKOFQ5F1wHnVu9uwgp88m+vh/Ww/kirROvcwMma3zmlOIur br2fNYwfrELtL8XW+fs6SXb8Ghk4TGnKJYwZ9V/Hc+6qbt9XtE+lj+090qEHgPEUKBq/ kctw== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuaGBdQGY0vIEM88SIlj6UJ5kexSxwDF2mEZjibRZt3T363YYvOu qA+GtrVgM8wiQpXvfObygjNLAJtr X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKcM0NnEuveLrf1XFawTXiDerfN4wZmc6VysDqDexN7N0Q1M4U89DhwZtozhMpxw1INkxG3Xw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:62cc:: with SMTP id o12mr5114774wrv.75.1588705296639; Tue, 05 May 2020 12:01:36 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.3] ([66.205.73.129]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id f8sm4845837wrm.8.2020.05.05.12.01.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 05 May 2020 12:01:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::42e; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x42e.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:249022 Archived-At: On 05.05.2020 21:56, João Távora wrote: >> There can be good reasons to have exceptions, exemptions, etc... but >> they should be understood as that. From this point of view, I think >> it's hard to justify an exception for `multibyte-string-p` > Other than: it's there already: it's ingrained in code and programmers > minds. I seriously doubt it's so ingrained in the minds: like Stefan said in the thread it was proposed in, this name is not so easy to recall, and one tends to try the `string-multibyte-p' variant first.