From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "David House" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Post-22.1 development? Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 16:32:08 +0100 Message-ID: References: <878xb05ras.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1181143942 23101 80.91.229.12 (6 Jun 2007 15:32:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 15:32:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Neal Becker" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 06 17:32:21 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HvxUd-0002EO-Rz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 17:32:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HvxUd-0003A9-9g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 11:32:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HvxUa-0003A4-7z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 11:32:12 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HvxUX-00039s-Tq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 11:32:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HvxUX-00039p-ON for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 11:32:09 -0400 Original-Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.162.239]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HvxUX-00046v-En for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 11:32:09 -0400 Original-Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id z3so165292nzf for ; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 08:32:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=W1HqY9sgdZqOAbbGFxRd/Rkv6Hb4gFPtxWeYn+ecz1lY/yMe4L3UFpiZgnbGGgyW6/BETudM8UUwZGOw6WqkFaHGRnXYGad3HNV2zH90xADY/ko8HYZFpKMSK3f8IKeQGtjQBC1deHowCwC3CqpsDB5AWn1N36+7i+SM6OcpM9o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=SJ729GFnDSozhbp799mKvhhpevO9XkjQunWIi7tYO29R7A16C9YfMC9yZbz/PkLhKuijVSDeaRGbEiukrqkWNiA7GmnHIYwBsQsiRS/jxkDlve8ybtKsOyF+FK4wGuVAa/C2yPBtJyIv2J/VPxXN0OVbreKRfTsifdCEjYPDSjk= Original-Received: by 10.142.110.3 with SMTP id i3mr31644wfc.1181143928163; Wed, 06 Jun 2007 08:32:08 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.142.104.20 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Jun 2007 08:32:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 (Google crawlbot) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:72347 Archived-At: On 06/06/07, Neal Becker wrote: > Which branch(es) should I be using if I want a maximally stable emacs but > with antialiased fonts? At this point, I believe unicode-2 is your best bet. The plan is to merge that into the trunk, though, so that Emacs 23 will contain support for XFT fonts by default. That's a while off yet, however. -- -David House, dmhouse@gmail.com