From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Rodgers Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should `describe-face' have a global binding? Should C-h i be a choice in C-h C-h? Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:33:36 -0600 Organization: IHS Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1153758923 25197 80.91.229.2 (24 Jul 2006 16:35:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 16:35:23 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 24 18:35:21 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G53Oe-0001Cb-Bn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 18:35:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G53Od-0005EL-TB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 12:35:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G53OP-0005EA-Fi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 12:34:53 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G53OO-0005DZ-2I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 12:34:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G53ON-0005DS-Mv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 12:34:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1G53PV-0004GE-BL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 12:36:01 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1G53OA-000185-E9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 18:34:38 +0200 Original-Received: from 207.167.42.206 ([207.167.42.206]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 18:34:38 +0200 Original-Received: from ihs_4664 by 207.167.42.206 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 18:34:38 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 20 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.167.42.206 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:57550 Archived-At: Richard Stallman wrote: > 1. The `C-h...' commands are one of the main entries to information, and to > customize, as well. Shouldn't users be able to find `describe-face' when > they do `C-h C-h'? > > Yes, if we can figure out a binding for it. > > I don't have a great suggestion for the C-h binding. (Perhaps `T' for > "typeface"?) > > For coherence, it should be a lower-case letter. The available ones > are g, o, u, x, y, z. None seems particularly approproate, but > perhaps g is a little better than the others since it can stand for > "graphics". `o' might be a good choice, since the facemenu commands are bound to `M-o' prefixed keys. (If I recall, it used to be `M-g'.) -- Kevin