From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Gitlab Migration Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2021 13:26:39 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87h7fcnmq0.fsf@posteo.net> <83tujbqg4j.fsf@gnu.org> <46353190-1190-495f-b15e-22980159b3ab@yandex.ru> <83y28mp0rb.fsf@gnu.org> <51a363db-fde7-791d-cf8d-98ac601d62ee@yandex.ru> <57ca4d78-2339-201d-edce-678c9b003a99@yandex.ru> <01341bd6-b94b-4f94-1461-405e723142ad@yandex.ru> <8735qmjklm.fsf@localhost> <87ilzi86h7.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3867"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 Cc: Daniel Fleischer , Richard Stallman , =?UTF-8?Q?Elias_M=c3=a5rtenson?= , emacs-devel , Stefan Monnier , Eli Zaretskii To: Philip Kaludercic , Ihor Radchenko Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 03 12:28:13 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mM6Qe-0000mY-E1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 12:28:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60124 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mM6Qd-0002OO-4t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 06:28:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60148) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mM6PH-0000oL-Cj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 06:26:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-x331.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::331]:38485) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mM6PE-0000h3-M1; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 06:26:47 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-x331.google.com with SMTP id k5-20020a05600c1c8500b002f76c42214bso3430088wms.3; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 03:26:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vdakfBp8af2PVNKrk+AtO3Mqejr/o+N4238JhWWtK3Y=; b=MHtKD9c7lOnSZhZ+07+Nif+yX+1SeoKFWISZwvA098TzAxyFQXnwt97mVRXyeUgAQa 11DN6RP9Lh+aPwUrg/FP4/M0x7Zwru12P2L+ZBlzLTquNNZCVLJ62UzxYmPvlUuotQGc 5VP0l6N/oY//F9OGozOibfRsZouTv0NIuoMIdZpULT8l10brFEAIwR91pja0l9uHHap3 6ARWUxvkCDj01HpeS6BAeAIrdaX25mP89ffZCoeWQPlCM7orxOLblBRQaO2sURpiNk/Q yPqUd0hiFuuXM/KRKfE9+Vxwas/gueYcO0TE+592JuGgUVYrbPPwNnY6zY7vLX/aWii/ P0xQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=vdakfBp8af2PVNKrk+AtO3Mqejr/o+N4238JhWWtK3Y=; b=VRv7XWmkJF81RAs+d2kudg5DAKuye0xHL92WELw9FHAFi74VcK81ckngaWjrqhIDz/ Uk8kLwCaF4xb4LPx99bwbAwyITJ1IzgPjof7Fm0A4EwYcINmZeJd+vwsm5NehGqZwF2A ur9tWDp+oNm11+qrR7ayvbm4W3Zh6HaXpuTDzp8apPGsbpNsUsjqUqlOawPGCbmjZEnX cyyo04StG8OAEw0RF/4m7ATaMppvSpHWG7ajhOZQWJafo8R7mPgkqCpe1TEaC1/gnpze 7xK1fB6cnjr9VYgWQkOaa9AwN2kI53dNctaTGMV+07S7JvGMfog/4WLaIxgthirz2hwl VMqg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532vk9t8jqMSQ4X0nwecqsnegP7wU+ZufZLc15MfT87bUcIFzoNh AOMaurs/5iQI3jy3xAA+RQIiVzhfpvI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx/+wvzOSPBCmH3iaGhJ/mK3VW0JpCuq8VVi7iwU5mmep1J0nw8beOP3dqJu2UnKOJsiRwOzQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:2e46:: with SMTP id q6mr7535408wmf.93.1630664802091; Fri, 03 Sep 2021 03:26:42 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id d8sm4563686wrv.20.2021.09.03.03.26.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 03 Sep 2021 03:26:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87ilzi86h7.fsf@posteo.net> Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::331; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x331.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -36 X-Spam_score: -3.7 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, NICE_REPLY_A=-2.225, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:273760 Archived-At: On 03.09.2021 10:26, Philip Kaludercic wrote: > Ihor Radchenko writes: > >> Can Emacs have "experimental" and "stable" dev branches with the former >> being more open to "popular" changes? Then, people who wish a more >> "popular" approach can use the experimental branch without disturbing >> more conservative users. If features in experimental branch prove their >> usefulness and quality, they can be moved to the stable branch. > In some sense this exists with prepared configurations (or > "distributions" as some call them). The changes they can make are not > exactly the same as a "experimental" branch could, but they can do a lot > of superficial and organisational changes. And as those distributions have been around for some time, we could look at the changes in options they made and strongly consider making the changes in defaults where those distributions agree, or largely agree. Those kind of arguments, however, aren't generally accepted around here either.