From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: A new user perspective about "Changes for emacs 28" Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 18:02:10 +0300 Message-ID: References: <1ca462fa-0f9e-3c18-6386-f43f49388b2f@gmail.com> <20200907180812.5tfylspp7i6vl4o3@Ergus> <94fda087-a61b-356d-4bb4-791907593246@yandex.ru> <24302cf8-5ac8-4abd-83ce-3e33c51a8beb@default> <83k0x4mjsv.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3080"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 Cc: nicola.manca85@gmail.com, spacibba@aol.com, drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , "Alfred M. Szmidt" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 08 17:03:11 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kFf9J-0000ej-8T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 17:03:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51408 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kFf9I-0007MY-6k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 11:03:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48866) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kFf8U-0006qJ-05 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 11:02:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lj1-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::235]:42122) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kFf8R-0003tG-Ls; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 11:02:17 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lj1-x235.google.com with SMTP id k25so20427707ljg.9; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 08:02:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5uHuMkTzjOOX1sbREVTqojTgUqCggjZvsnnLfmdXxOw=; b=EDSkCgii+NA7c3mHdCCZ0wuyo9JInOXWHXzHRp0QhD1NKl1+C0LOrg2Ywmgt3pi+83 xemCjYJVWfItNVmyO/ArbyIU8y3n5K7J6icR1CQeWPGZ+FWwtpnEG9TwRV7l3sPFw9ct cAXn93wRsmuQuXanitqdFRQOu+UjwROCzoiXO3BxmWwzOQRmEwxOrJKOp2k0cW15uXUH Rw/nQ1B4Sugj95gf0lRuoXSp+Dg8AtTpGTv8t+Y2OEBQoQQKJJUtnlRko4WQxIdYeXXi 05dczvVN0FlNTe4gCFWSaPbnj7liSViQWi+0egirAse8UoA9MDszm4Y4srjb7Umh6btC EjIA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5uHuMkTzjOOX1sbREVTqojTgUqCggjZvsnnLfmdXxOw=; b=ZOUzcUqZakkkE0dwEdvlkk38TDIjIygw1dgLR2PmrBTv11Vj3wm8CQBSGxlQwQCumY 4jaz9pHo2S6oh2491jjXOZDIQszBZP61MVwW8kyrDyu5aykJOsjgQx3jJwtWxVuCcucd KNQImlYII7O+fTliScDx/q4CMbNDAdKrJA8gtEBlOqzvAfdszhId3pTMHRQKXrmlYrZ4 2k+yXZcxJH6q7efad6l55ssPZ0mufRoVXVveCoHR/bXQ/iEAOWXtE+8CAlCX2qJirNE4 y0ejYLq2osTmWtvY8jZp+tA5S8+txmIAsgLhXoXLWryP9SyTkiAEtka3P8woMObMXZ7N 8/Yg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533dKDs2RNA0YLSjHjW8j3smd0Hu5F/iJ0dJgdQV140AxO9Zkrg0 ft3xwHJp7iNWg+nq/1LGLQ6HNjpKzSs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyB/zBIdoLQ67BSBrKKqoouHlvmbZFLNWSfoauFCXBvGXN/5pPJMfrES8MssTtDzxa6Q/NcSA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:386:: with SMTP id e6mr4449131ljp.424.1599577332573; Tue, 08 Sep 2020 08:02:12 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.104] ([94.229.108.16]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id y8sm8769569ljy.107.2020.09.08.08.02.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 08 Sep 2020 08:02:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83k0x4mjsv.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::235; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-lj1-x235.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -30 X-Spam_score: -3.1 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.626, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:254742 Archived-At: On 08.09.2020 17:20, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Once more complex > situation arise, my opinion is that undo-tree is more complex and > harder to grasp than the Emacs undo, so I don't think undo-tree is > better suited to newbies than the default undo. I'm pretty sure undo-tree is better for complex situations thanks to of its visualization interface. But that's orthogonal to the question of suitability for newbies.