From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: dhruva Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Optimized gcc 4.3.0 build on Windows returns 0 secs for all time values of system-process-attributes Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 22:59:01 +0530 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1230744565 2649 80.91.229.12 (31 Dec 2008 17:29:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 17:29:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Devel To: "Juanma Barranquero" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 31 18:30:33 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LI4tq-00017b-T0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 31 Dec 2008 18:30:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52589 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LI4sc-0004Ct-W2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 31 Dec 2008 12:29:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LI4sX-00047L-7B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Dec 2008 12:29:09 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LI4sU-00041C-4y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Dec 2008 12:29:08 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42059 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LI4sT-00040y-Uk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Dec 2008 12:29:05 -0500 Original-Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.142.188]:30880) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LI4sT-0000Jq-H3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Dec 2008 12:29:05 -0500 Original-Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id u5so4197458tia.10 for ; Wed, 31 Dec 2008 09:29:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=MveGiRmkhc/d1pqGOEIKlhVVgmryMTw76WkJv30NX/o=; b=KJpqsPnAaX3j3xZONqpFyMpgWnpndKiT+u1Jtc7AFQUPiwm7RKCyxL6SQHvELrU6pF wJ7ZBNCAqtHsQPY3WrysMEgXnvyDVX7kZjebI56fin7FHPajr5PSzGFR4hsG/NBJ026/ 2G2rqEc40gu/gNakTu4y/hBp+iomWCM+xlpc4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=xhYeYC2yMJTj3Qmsyz8OvC/rqOYWtslHPcIEkZsfs6ki1kVxF1YXfotVyy2K9Zit6h iGEb8cCqFNe8FGU48tfaOpboEMCC42ZT2b5sCDMitf8N3yvUSJS89e7lxKpZUYhiVuNB DL2iKBs+addQXBMqRNgBw96HnPxrmlnDaFESo= Original-Received: by 10.110.40.8 with SMTP id n8mr4182640tin.0.1230744541490; Wed, 31 Dec 2008 09:29:01 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.110.8.12 with HTTP; Wed, 31 Dec 2008 09:29:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:107470 Archived-At: Hello, On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 6:30 PM, Juanma Barranquero wrote: > Building Emacs on Windows with the following compiler > > gcc (GCC) 4.3.0 20080305 (alpha-testing) mingw-20080502 > > and optimizations on, Emacs returns 0 seconds for all time values > computed in w32.c:process_times: > > ELISP> (mapcar (lambda (p) (assq 'start (system-process-attributes > p))) (list-system-processes)) > (nil > (start 0 0 0) > (start 0 0 484375) > (start 0 0 484375) > (start 0 0 921875) > ;;; etc > > and the same goes for 'utime, 'ctime and 'etime. > > Could someone please try with another version of MinGW GCC? I confirm the same results, I am having a similar setup on WXP. -dhruva -- Contents reflect my personal views only!