From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: dhruva Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Font backend: Observations on speed on Windows Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 16:19:18 +0530 Message-ID: References: <484F8FEF.6020207@gnu.org> <63sg2uy8.fsf@telefonica.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1213181383 32211 80.91.229.12 (11 Jun 2008 10:49:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:49:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Jason Rumney To: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=D3scar_Fuentes?=" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 11 12:50:25 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K6NuF-0001Rm-4V for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:50:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56139 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K6NtR-00018F-LJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 06:49:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K6NtN-00017o-7c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 06:49:25 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K6NtJ-00015a-FS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 06:49:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33392 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K6NtJ-00015R-2N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 06:49:21 -0400 Original-Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.142.190]:46083) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K6NtI-0008Nb-GB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 06:49:20 -0400 Original-Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id u5so843590tia.10 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 03:49:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=/nCNPiAtIEIDG2yDCmI2Iol9/AgMXtEr6HaVtJ7DdDA=; b=it5tCnhvEtzh4DD0iWQwOvfGW5n9TCkqIFEwmayC5GDeJ+AvdhsGrQbNlvJN7nWDXn ueiOHTSE7X/zl4yTeXa3PYyBiEPClVnzgEsuvMGuT+NhIYaNm0AhKOoc+NSvKnkBNF3p Q/sVMr/B7aiW+S9DDORFs8IB1tbkN4SWAitf8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=c3rAy8iz3dCUfuRMVKfGaboat0ZYRxHP2TP+qxEHEShtvZWas/BgcLdkdoRraa10gO B8S+q1RFmHGk0TLPkZAoLWn8RJqClBQqfaaAnDXNVasHY7wk35PjWwu/jw6FZCBjBFBv ygJHe+ql/HVnTsjqgdkLBiR+9euWxZnwe7MoU= Original-Received: by 10.110.92.8 with SMTP id p8mr1379797tib.9.1213181358356; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 03:49:18 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.110.90.17 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 03:49:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:98938 Archived-At: Hi, On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 3:13 PM, =D3scar Fuentes wrote: >> By doing so, I see a noticeable increase in speed. I am now going to >> profile emacs to see the difference. I apologize for the premature claims. The profiling did not show any difference either. My earlier claims were based on perceptions and was flawed because my expectations influenced my perceptions! -dky --=20 Contents reflect my personal views only!