From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: dhruva Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.comp.version-control.bazaar-ng.general Subject: Re: Emacs Bazaar repository Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 18:21:14 +0530 Message-ID: References: <87skyvse7k.fsf@xmission.com> <87r6ecsww7.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <200803180148.m2I1m0dB003724@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> <87fxuoznk2.fsf@red-bean.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1206103895 31618 80.91.229.12 (21 Mar 2008 12:51:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 12:51:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juanma Barranquero , bazaar@lists.canonical.com, Emacs Devel To: "Stefan Monnier" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 21 13:52:04 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jcgj5-0006x7-8W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 13:52:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JcgiU-0006qr-Og for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 08:51:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JcgiQ-0006ok-Te for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 08:51:22 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JcgiO-0006lQ-Fh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 08:51:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JcgiO-0006lH-9K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 08:51:20 -0400 Original-Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.142.184]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JcgiN-0001wE-PU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 08:51:20 -0400 Original-Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id a20so488310tia.10 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 05:51:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=iNv06uhUcThgVsfkFIsaLLzZbbClyumndrEWv0pI2K4=; b=jhy5aTiCnwkNpbVZvYamNL1tWF7vj+Py3EgW7qY+doqOEkvxTU9Nyd4B1beemonKR2wnYx8eM5vGn4lqHngdx0TUtSO+knR4WNWQyKdw6QldeB2KKzZ+RaZSFVmAvnXM2s0XVy5Rfk49ztcfFmO9QNoSaCSIwnaGuPGDv7cLlz0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=KTe7vrscpfGlMgX2ge4f3iTBTatqoqFdiyCnAra6YbygwXloRFu3Kf1VJy/DlYrTtOZ6v9n/WcHw1ImihszDxTYZwArigZWoDSDUGpRJyvtgRFKQPm7+jYmEr1MRPlsMNl0HXu+yVTWhjBbOVu5SSgUwqnIbmlZoKwkRE81x4nk= Original-Received: by 10.110.70.5 with SMTP id s5mr893381tia.6.1206103874735; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 05:51:14 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.110.3.13 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Mar 2008 05:51:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:93113 gmane.comp.version-control.bazaar-ng.general:39045 Archived-At: Hi, On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 7:30 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote: > I was not talking about performance (we know about those problems > already). I'm expecting problems such as "doesn't build", e.g. because > of EOL issues. I face problems when I network connectivity is choppy. I get a crash when I lose network connection in between a 'bzr pull'. Every time I see the traceback, I fear corrupting my repository and having to do a clone all over again. It unfortunately comes back to performance. Had it been fast, I will have done another clone and compared the folders or something like that. From a feature perspective, bzr is mature enough to be able to use in big projects. Just the performance bottlenecks makes it difficult to accept it. I hear that there are some patches for bzr to make it fast. I request the bzr developers to create a bzr branch with performance improvements that we can just pull and use. -dhruva -- Contents reflect my personal views only!