From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: dhruva Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs Bazaar repository Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:34:56 +0530 Message-ID: References: <87skyvse7k.fsf@xmission.com> <87fxuvl0gi.fsf@offby1.atm01.sea.blarg.net> <87bq5j19ok.fsf@workhorse.earlhome> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205395530 12398 80.91.229.12 (13 Mar 2008 08:05:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:05:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Jason Earl" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 13 09:05:56 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JZiRg-0006hV-TE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:05:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZiR7-0000sP-SJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 04:05:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZiR0-0000pr-OS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 04:05:06 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZiQw-0000jI-NI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 04:05:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZiQv-0000j9-Jj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 04:05:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JZiQv-0006Pe-3H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 04:05:01 -0400 Original-Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.142.189]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JZiQu-0008SF-1T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 04:05:00 -0400 Original-Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id a20so1306896tia.10 for ; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 01:04:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=wNTr/5Brg81ah3LIQ4WI3L2XV14HvH+065oiIjjmRWw=; b=v0TgjGwdLmn+VDYdcu6qCeRlYmf6sHdaP9niCdCuaPeItAQhxglc1vEX/g15sFl6uVtA5iaLvouxh6y3jlcKuTbADRgWCNaRqS95k6EdYHE6/DpnORGvaL6oHzCnCUDy/ZbOzADpCcyZJzWOK9VDYNEABrJYWaqJs3FtqeNFtJw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=RErgNV26WILJGS1cI2Mmn2lJEM3YEn4bAdkTrbTvyW1Nqgt8HA6o7u8R77/I1tUbE5PS0jYMhB6MAzP2OkaAnB/QNu/vSZZuTqQV13ko5fi134K1XaABIRkP0KdBtOmLNR63Kr4l7c6e8syc5q5MKJJGMYxNsNVWHGNA0/cwI0M= Original-Received: by 10.110.31.5 with SMTP id e5mr2690423tie.38.1205395496520; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 01:04:56 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.110.3.13 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 01:04:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87bq5j19ok.fsf@workhorse.earlhome> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by mx20.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:92379 Archived-At: Hi, I got bzr setup and running on my M$-XP box. I got the bzr repo of emacs (by downloading the emacs.tar.gz) and updated it to the latest. I wanted to make sure the recent changesets are pulled in. I typed "bzr log -l 10". It took ~24 seconds (elapsed time from perfmon) consistently. Whereas Mercurial (hg log -l 10) on the trunk to 2 seconds (and the mercurial repo is on a CIFS mounted drive while bzr repo was on local disk). GIT was fastest though even on a CIFS mounted system. IMHO, the performance aspects must be considered seriously. -dhruva -- Contents reflect my personal views only!