From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: dhruva Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.comp.version-control.bazaar-ng.general Subject: Re: Emacs Bazaar repository Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:42:51 +0530 Message-ID: References: <87skyvse7k.fsf@xmission.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205377986 4596 80.91.229.12 (13 Mar 2008 03:13:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:13:06 +0000 (UTC) To: "Stefan Monnier" , "Jason Earl" , bazaar@lists.canonical.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 13 04:13:34 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JZdsr-0002Sr-6f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 04:13:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZdsI-00061S-2k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 23:12:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZdsE-000615-IS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 23:12:54 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZdsE-00060t-0c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 23:12:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZdsD-00060q-M5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 23:12:53 -0400 Original-Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.142.188]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JZdsD-0006p2-Cz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 23:12:53 -0400 Original-Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id a20so1294047tia.10 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:12:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=Tj9KVpdVEZISg7wIGki3i9IDgWDWI58LleU+YbrEj9c=; b=YI0FAl9B+XcZ1lvbQ3+lhtQTQoKVRa2JPC1Ez6FypIq/fyP8iFakDmzKzU+ggwGzJ+db4iDCh6xIkqog/86wsbFoIszsi5ZAWVKLX37yUTwa/tXl/wsXin4pKlM5nQZkzZLVko59xmp1bZBzx+Td0gI3XAkigDWpGxwYK3yOpcY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ApTX+zUOXMDeOe8bit5N+ASXzox617iw3pICoHD8NUdrYw/c8LPF0hqlYBojjzdqsh9QrAt8kXYnXf6sJkfkPy9da0qtGrjupN9Sp9woQNxPJdN7F/kbfAaE0fqEl7kTCFKG7XXQNsD7eCn9n55NNd8ddYlGdXv+KFS/0T8C0Eg= Original-Received: by 10.110.68.10 with SMTP id q10mr2669182tia.22.1205377971108; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:12:51 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.110.3.13 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:12:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:92358 gmane.comp.version-control.bazaar-ng.general:38419 Archived-At: Sounds practical. I will start using bazaar baz/bzr(is it bazaar-ng written in python or the earlier 'c' implementation). For records, I have tried using all the emacs repositories from cvs,tla,hg,git and will try bzr/baz too. Command usage and deployment based, tla was toughest followed by git and cvs. mercurial were easiest to deploy and use. If it is bzr (python implementation), it will share mercurial's ease of deployment. -dhruva On 3/13/08, Stefan Monnier wrote: > > Well, now we have cvs, git, mercurial and bazaar. Having a subversion > > You forgot to mention Arch, which with CVS is the only one actually used > very actively for development (it's used to keep branches in sync). > > > repository will complete the long story. > > I just hope this indecision will not continue for too long and confuse > > people in terms of which repository to use. So far, i just had to > > mention 'emacs head' has this problem on some platform in reporting > > bugs. I have now started adding the repo info too! > > I request the new maintainers to make a decision in the near future > > and streamline this for 23 series. > > As long as the forgeign branches are kept in sync with the CVS branches, > I don't think it's a big deal. For me the plan goes as follows: > - ascertain that Bzr is good enough for our usage pattern. > - place Bzr branches that mirror the CVS ones (and are kept in sync) > on savannah. > - get vc-status to a good enough shape to be usable on those Bzr branches. > - get Miles to switch from Arch to Bzr to do the merge between branches. > - drop the CVS repository. > > > Stefan > -- Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com Contents reflect my personal views only!