From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: dhruva Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:04:39 +0530 Message-ID: References: <20071230122217.3CA84830B9A@snark.thyrsus.com> <4pd9g15e.fsf@blue.sea.net> <87r6g7z3m2.fsf@everybody.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1201188937 7994 80.91.229.12 (24 Jan 2008 15:35:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:35:37 +0000 (UTC) To: "Juanma Barranquero" , "Mark A. Hershberger" , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 24 16:35:56 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JI475-0003VX-WE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 16:35:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JI46f-0007C7-Ud for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:35:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JI46G-0006s6-WA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:34:45 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JI46F-0006qN-DQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:34:44 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JI46F-0006qB-5S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:34:43 -0500 Original-Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.182]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JI46F-0005vB-0y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:34:43 -0500 Original-Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k34so513054wah.10 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 07:34:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=h4tvVRctS1wes6xGz0fUqYpgm/VvkzlxEj7W692M8mQ=; b=FK9QlwVykhIbagBVZ/TCWXlO/oqRtHUXBBZj1hewbCrBCG9AlKXqeiE1xrNpe/DX0AEKOdpNPFqDIGTBVrT9+H9hs3HdjjUdhvtCQjoCr4Ei2GD5Kjr6ATltiuezVyf8gXUn2ryUorTw76vXHdvGB9ViDAKbHrKFsYuTva4nz6o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=lQUQd6m9qz5QxC4uANfg9i6TbG5YzicrDOdpskEpZgrmG2h1z7cZX4aqM73RAsW95dv4JBAYQdYCJTG7JMp9QMJHQCVGDJtmDI95fn+24ogWsQ8+HoSEkWPk+DzEcRnVWT/KSAZEdlgu0EXEFaa1VtiYFRt3k5POule8ah6N1rw= Original-Received: by 10.114.12.9 with SMTP id 9mr928481wal.23.1201188880547; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 07:34:40 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.115.73.6 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 07:34:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:87444 Archived-At: Hi, I would consider the ability to convert to other repository formats as important too. Whatever VCS gets adopted must not lose any history data and have enough metadata to be able to convert to other VCS formats. Though I am biased towards mercurial, there is one git feature I consider very good. Ability to run a git server for existing cvs clients. Though this might be contradictory to dVCS concepts (not too sure though) -dky On 1/24/08, Juanma Barranquero wrote: > On Jan 24, 2008 3:43 PM, Mark A. Hershberger wrote: > > > Another reason to prefer it: stand-alone bzr binaries are available and > > work *now* in Windows. > > That's also true of mercurial, monotone, darcs and git, depending of > how you do define "work now". > > Juanma > > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-devel mailing list > Emacs-devel@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel > -- Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com Contents reflect my personal views only!