From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: dhruva Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Folding emacsclient into emacs Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 16:27:27 +0530 Message-ID: References: <85bqc7hfau.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <868x79slkb.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <857imscvzn.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85642b9iar.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1189940258 28406 80.91.229.12 (16 Sep 2007 10:57:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 10:57:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Devel To: "David Kastrup" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 16 12:57:36 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IWrom-0006ME-Gf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Sep 2007 12:57:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IWrol-000384-D1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Sep 2007 06:57:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IWroi-00037r-Gu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Sep 2007 06:57:32 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IWrog-00036S-2U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Sep 2007 06:57:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IWrof-00036P-W2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Sep 2007 06:57:30 -0400 Original-Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.184]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IWrof-0007d0-Hw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Sep 2007 06:57:29 -0400 Original-Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f5so965576nfh for ; Sun, 16 Sep 2007 03:57:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=Z8cirQjYN08FtGk61b+FLJB4a4jxZtjHNq/BrtA/+Ho=; b=qhiFZkBPO/P3WAegN5J0E7DxttwBjiNrEh06BfLBnflyX4IShe2PEdY8sO/QcumipLzhB8pEPsWHJ/pablB1cYd9aeeGuc4rlXH6XqveVqU244bka/AAV2lEGcQpXjH8HdkcWVoDTS+iXcsDuu94lQd2gtFeVjcilOLL23IK4es= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ByN7MczD1YVZC8dlWYPGU1kbOkKApDIhgSUbkleaAg7Qfse6rlMznnYl+7tAgHGY6u2p5Q3NiDa3046FeNtGIQF49B4v0IPfSz0pAeFcRIb7tVRL6aRLQ7URzth9tE12djEPi8WY7G2+hevnoDS9EQ4+Hd7p+Y1tu7Nop7ai36s= Original-Received: by 10.78.201.10 with SMTP id y10mr1968437huf.1189940247461; Sun, 16 Sep 2007 03:57:27 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.78.90.19 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Sep 2007 03:57:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <85642b9iar.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Content-Disposition: inline X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:79031 Archived-At: Hi, On 9/16/07, David Kastrup wrote: > No, that is nonsense. We don't want Emacs to behave unpredictable: I really do not see anything unpredictable there. If it was too unpredictable, I would not have clearly enumerated the various options. Each variant involves a very conscious user interaction. -dky -- Dhruva Krishnamurthy Contents reflect my personal views only!