From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: dhruva Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Info about available CVS/Arch/Git branches Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 11:42:30 +0530 Message-ID: References: <87r6m9za8o.fsf@hariken.mwolson.org> <86r6m7kbyn.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <87eji7iwa4.fsf@meyering.net> <86hcn3ka5f.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1187590362 2240 80.91.229.12 (20 Aug 2007 06:12:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 06:12:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Miles Bader" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 20 08:12:40 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IN0VD-0006YW-SS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 08:12:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IN0VD-000702-F8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 02:12:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IN0VA-0006yi-Ic for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 02:12:36 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IN0V9-0006x9-JR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 02:12:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IN0V9-0006wy-HN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 02:12:35 -0400 Original-Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.243]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IN0V8-00024V-NO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2007 02:12:34 -0400 Original-Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c25so78875ana for ; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 23:12:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=bP1MAOzYYcT/CKe/Vmna34ByjwoLG/hoslEbhX4EuL/gto0I/lh79VJ6S+nkcuIi+0K3+WJ1xQErRsezNLMQA4rNdwh7bKSu6LdPKLprjMmCS5GNvOdF8jVgzsFAmuIJo8QSRzB5FzlL27NzxABi6VNRHNsE0vFoHijVi1N6W6I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=bhsMbMUay09Zt7i25l0TX4/MgraP6mqm043QgPBIfOxNfd/px9M9XvbFbHXXMqJ1t/1x0t/hf8OQWAHQAwRoX1dMVnN+BpuIk44sZ4QcBS0cZuCA/2p+tnt6MABvhPWWX5nSfMia/LBpdtMjWVrs2KThwqhjeQJOPclXp3rdx4A= Original-Received: by 10.78.184.2 with SMTP id h2mr1722024huf.1187590351047; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 23:12:31 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.78.206.20 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 23:12:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:76809 Archived-At: Hi, On 8/20/07, Miles Bader wrote: > dhruva writes: > > I am quite prejudiced when it comes to using CYGWIN. > > What does that mean?? Having used MKS toolkit and MinGW, I personally feel they are much faster as they do not need an emulation layer (based on limited usage and knowledge). Even AT&T UWIN out performed other equivalents. The fork implementation in UWIN was far superior (similar to MS-SFU). -dky -- Dhruva Krishnamurthy Contents reflect my personal views only!