From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Rodgers Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: re-builder highlighting incorrect for more than 3 groupings Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 09:21:10 -0600 Organization: IHS Message-ID: References: <87r73ljvfa.fsf@myusenet.dyndns.org> <444F19B7.9080906@gmx.at> <44532003.1000709@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1146496964 8672 80.91.229.2 (1 May 2006 15:22:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 15:22:44 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 01 17:22:43 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FaaEH-0004IE-Gb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 May 2006 17:22:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FaaEG-0001xN-UW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 May 2006 11:22:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FaaE5-0001xI-ID for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 May 2006 11:22:17 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FaaE3-0001x0-AF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 May 2006 11:22:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FaaE3-0001wq-4R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 May 2006 11:22:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1FaaHt-0006yH-1I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 May 2006 11:26:13 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1FaaDp-0004Da-JY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 May 2006 17:22:01 +0200 Original-Received: from 207.167.42.206 ([207.167.42.206]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 01 May 2006 17:22:01 +0200 Original-Received: from ihs_4664 by 207.167.42.206 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 01 May 2006 17:22:01 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 12 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.167.42.206 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:53731 Archived-At: Richard Stallman wrote: > The maximum of nine expressions applies only in "sub-expression mode". > In "normal" mode you would have to settle on an appropriate strategy > anyway when there are more than nine subexpressions. > > Ok, would people please install the face-cycling patch? And define reb-match-[4-9] as well, to avoid cycling when there are less than 10 subexpressions. -- Kevin Rodgers