From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=c3=a9ment_Pit-Claudel?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why are so many great packages not trying to get included in GNU Emacs? Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 13:36:08 -0400 Message-ID: References: <834kslao2y.fsf@gnu.org> <052569f9-0571-6471-7a27-f3d7b36497a0@gmail.com> <83sgg58ari.fsf@gnu.org> <837dxh847w.fsf@gnu.org> <834ksl833q.fsf@gnu.org> <20200512201727.GA50065@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <960f9bf2-7931-1984-cb2f-ae32fe338928@gmail.com> <20200513165839.GA50560@breton.holly.idiocy.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="64201"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 To: Alan Third , Eli Zaretskii , casouri@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, eric@ericabrahamsen.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, ndame@protonmail.com, phillip.lord@russet.org.uk Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed May 13 19:41:45 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jYvO5-000Gam-44 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 13 May 2020 19:41:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33068 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYvO4-0003wS-2m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 13 May 2020 13:41:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57770) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYvIk-0002iE-Jt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 May 2020 13:36:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qt1-x82a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::82a]:45030) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYvIj-0000Dn-QS; Wed, 13 May 2020 13:36:14 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qt1-x82a.google.com with SMTP id r8so468380qtm.11; Wed, 13 May 2020 10:36:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8fBKfGU/WK2v9l78VnqXw//3I0QVW+0GP10xK1au1dA=; b=O237sdBpiYqy/CWK3jEV36zI6CnqVVxoKLnzPZx2KNACYbnO6+JOWQFcYXei8t0PCO XGMt2xthP0YH2ZwUdTyjsqXFTKtk7zgFSjlx2Q7Mh5ukpRQv0mqtYlr3ao1qtWfbfgyt YO/xpxGzwpfz3mDo0mZNxgjS7HVBDIvNxeOuVT6WD8ZKaR95v5TypjByai1RySXBqpgo HKT3sTO8bbvGxk2QnC2cNr1jKdr9mucT8qR6+6296s3L+QwO2kUcn8n/RxoXnrcuU6re E6kraMtb5YjSKvJr9Po3TT3b8S0JKcnuzpzNUBevnENIMaaYa7ozoxRDOm2J4ABGitJv OuBg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=8fBKfGU/WK2v9l78VnqXw//3I0QVW+0GP10xK1au1dA=; b=hx+NZ2JKbRNN8nqevo2bi8MIJ9/Pk5GZRv/PE8JeIknr5MAvgsuH+qP5ODbbGborkY TT1tzlYxrojIDo1AQ6jk5vXJow/aKK+KkxKyjtrJC3Mvl28jxZvZPw52t9dXAxOr8lVM luC/IhvHYZfwpDLyJoXVD3xb1N94KeQj0AFbfkT2LNSZ6lkRXN1/vx4Fjfowi3QnKXCw darQK+7ktju/0XoUGD+3iaFw/5+brYY+hK3jm2JUNjpFaaQjdQ28xJYgLXANMgj7FMEn 766XhFlp+p80VcwZBC9LzQhyJWKgwWnxprRrmHbpQ21B7MKYvH8QpWrVPXIlb7Js0a8Z pHKQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533k/Dv1hytdNcKohGqHQ/dW+YLTz0H5qgtTR6Pr50UcOLZvmQNQ r9dc2Gk+1WnrD4bz/uLhjwo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyOlt21hy40S36JWwJ5m0JlrMhMNQGPuSL2sm2Zakv9/Ux9I/dafag9IshrOQACwQVjL9eRdw== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:4311:: with SMTP id z17mr218910qtm.316.1589391372148; Wed, 13 May 2020 10:36:12 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ?IPv6:2601:184:4180:66e7:4d17:b25e:8d9:2188? ([2601:184:4180:66e7:4d17:b25e:8d9:2188]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id d82sm389666qke.81.2020.05.13.10.36.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 13 May 2020 10:36:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20200513165839.GA50560@breton.holly.idiocy.org> Content-Language: en-GB Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::82a; envelope-from=cpitclaudel@gmail.com; helo=mail-qt1-x82a.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:250154 Archived-At: On 13/05/2020 12.58, Alan Third wrote: > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 11:03:06PM -0400, Clément Pit-Claudel wrote: >> >> But the complexity of PGP is a valid concern. I operated under the >> assumption that most new contributors sign copyright papers with >> PGP, and so that PGP was a reasonable baseline. > > I didn’t sign mine with PGP, as far as I can remember, so my > assumption was that most people don’t. Is it a new requirement? It's not a new requirement, just a new option, I think :) (well, not so new: I did mine in 2014 with PGP). >> Alan, do you >> have advice on handling these situations? > > I’m afraid not. Usually I check the Emacs repo to see if they’re > already in it, if not then I ask if they’ve signed the papers, and > usually Eli pops up with the answer before they reply. OK, thanks a lot.