From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "paul r" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Usability suggestion : completion for M-: Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:16:56 +0100 Message-ID: References: <000701c88785$bd26dce0$0600a8c0@us.oracle.com> <87d4puxx2b.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205951280 16216 80.91.229.12 (19 Mar 2008 18:28:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:28:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bzg@altern.org, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Stefan Monnier" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 19 19:28:29 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from mail-forward.uio.no ([129.240.10.42]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jc31L-0006wF-5v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:28:15 +0100 Original-Received: from mail-mx9.uio.no ([129.240.10.39]) by pat.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Jc30l-0006dU-RF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:27:39 +0100 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by mail-mx9.uio.no with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Jc30W-0006Rp-J0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 19:27:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jc2x1-0006Yy-5L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:23:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jc2ww-0006Wc-V4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:23:42 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jc2wp-0006QX-Fe for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:23:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jc2wp-0006QU-AC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:23:35 -0400 Original-Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.128.189]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jc2wm-0000lr-BN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:23:35 -0400 Original-Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 26so620621fkx.10 for ; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 11:17:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=41jIvkN/hNE+5RP+yPeMNYve1zZ4wtR/Le5A24Qb7vg=; b=fmbu0JvbX2zY3KIxgQ+YqVY4dnS1PImCDwG+dwnVHpKg8PejbU3qNbxRDQjeGZx3+rA6gSfW3QfjCYxODmGp/Vko1M4b6ca62adhYsa3P6RYmqy751ZsEIsSk8gmued0qA740+uZszC1oECTgVMysPwgzO+K6Eg75ujS37kC+CY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=RP8GZhMEBNsC7Cam5keAg1E4YROYytMMJem8dWbVfnxfD21+N6p8udCoPmmAGZ12ueHBqCpLzjyfEQnzur4/6sl0o2UZ4RlYGn5Gw61KMI4LCVXVvxF7nLOq9E1aGFKV2hdlHBZSJs9ZMDS5J/q28snsrUs7kz+ldfisJ3e0MLw= Original-Received: by 10.82.155.10 with SMTP id c10mr1360481bue.28.1205950621915; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 11:17:01 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.82.175.3 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 11:16:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-UiO-SPF-Received: Received-SPF: pass (mail-mx9.uio.no: domain of gnu.org designates 199.232.76.165 as permitted sender) client-ip=199.232.76.165; envelope-from=emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-1.0, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1) X-UiO-Scanned: 46FF8971E9DB0270B735B148AAE84BE721D9F5E3 X-UiO-SR-test: E05A8D7C50F80C9E212FF7F9CFBEC7834F2BD269 X-UiO-SPAM-Test: remote_host: 199.232.76.165 spam_score: -9 maxlevel 200 minaction 2 bait 0 mail/h: 10 total 43802 max/h 424 blacklist 0 greylist 0 ratelimit 0 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:92995 Archived-At: > Since under ttys, TAB and C-i are usually indistinguishable, I'd rather > not being them to different commands, since that would only work > on GUIs. That what I was wondering. That makes C-i unavailable. This is in a way similar to the "unavailability" of M-Tab in many environments. FWIW, I notice C-Tab is delivered as : - C-Tab under X - Tab under xterm and similar - Tab under TTY -- paul