unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "paul r" <paul.r.ml@gmail.com>
To: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com>
Cc: Juri Linkov <juri@jurta.org>, cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Usability suggestion : completion for M-:
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2008 19:42:58 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e30f0f320803161142i3ceb578v669e0ea81f54984@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000701c88785$bd26dce0$0600a8c0@us.oracle.com>

 Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>:

>  Why do that, especially if, as you admit, it is just a temporary hack: "in
>  the meantime"? In-the-meantime changes can become fixed by neglect, for no
>  special reason, rather than being just temporary exceptions to the rule. The
>  result of lots of such changes would be ad-hoc inconsistency throughout the
>  UI.

I think this "Agree" was not clear enough. I agree on the idea that
M-: could *certainly* be made better, just like any other part of
emacs. You seem to have some ideas on that topic, and if you write a
M-x eval-expression-full-bodied , I will for sure give it a fair try.
I have no doubt on your skills to produce wise and good quality code.

But the point is that *today*, only eval-expression exists, and I
think Tab for completion makes more sens that Tab for self-insert,
and, above all, is more intuitive. And this thread is all about
binding *by default* Tab to give it a more intuitive behaviour in
fresh emacs install. But I think I stated that enough now, and you
clearly stated your position as well, so it could help to have other
people advice on that point, concerning the *current implementation*
of M-:




  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-16 18:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-13 17:30 Usability suggestion : completion for M-: paul r
2008-03-13 18:04 ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2008-03-13 21:16 ` Drew Adams
2008-03-13 21:32   ` paul r
2008-03-13 21:45     ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2008-03-13 23:32 ` Chong Yidong
2008-03-13 23:49   ` Drew Adams
2008-03-21  5:21     ` Drew Adams
2008-03-14  8:52   ` paul r
2008-03-15 21:36   ` Juri Linkov
2008-03-15 23:35     ` Drew Adams
2008-03-15 23:43       ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2008-03-16  8:12         ` Drew Adams
2008-03-16 11:00           ` paul r
2008-03-16 11:21             ` Ralf Angeli
2008-03-16 16:52             ` Drew Adams
2008-03-16 12:27           ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2008-03-16 16:50             ` Drew Adams
2008-03-16  0:17       ` Juri Linkov
2008-03-16  8:11         ` Drew Adams
2008-03-16 10:48           ` Andreas Schwab
2008-03-16 12:22             ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2008-03-16 13:36               ` Andreas Schwab
2008-03-16 10:56           ` paul r
2008-03-16 16:49             ` Drew Adams
2008-03-16 18:42               ` paul r [this message]
2008-03-16 19:56                 ` Bastien
2008-03-16 20:22                   ` David De La Harpe Golden
2008-03-17  2:52                   ` Stefan Monnier
2008-03-17  4:07                     ` Mike Mattie
2008-03-17 13:32                       ` Stefan Monnier
2008-03-17  9:32                     ` paul r
2008-03-17 19:16                     ` Richard Stallman
2008-03-18  9:19                       ` paul r
2008-03-19  2:53                         ` Richard Stallman
2008-03-19 16:28                           ` Stefan Monnier
2008-03-19 18:16                             ` paul r
2008-03-19 19:25                               ` Andreas Schwab
2008-03-16 18:49               ` paul r
2008-03-16 12:31           ` Lennart Borgman (gmail)
2008-03-16 16:50             ` Drew Adams
2008-03-16 20:06         ` Bastien Guerry
2008-03-22 21:14     ` Chong Yidong
2008-03-23  2:30       ` Juri Linkov
2008-03-23  5:54         ` Drew Adams
2008-04-09 20:42 ` Paul R
2008-04-09 21:20   ` Drew Adams
2008-04-10 23:12     ` Juri Linkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e30f0f320803161142i3ceb578v669e0ea81f54984@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=paul.r.ml@gmail.com \
    --cc=cyd@stupidchicken.com \
    --cc=drew.adams@oracle.com \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=juri@jurta.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).