From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gregory Heytings Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Entering emojis Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 19:20:42 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87cznths5j.fsf@gnus.org> <83zgqxymd3.fsf@gnu.org> <878rygj4gt.fsf@gnus.org> <83wnm0zz0q.fsf@gnu.org> <874k94j3rn.fsf@gnus.org> <83v91kzydh.fsf@gnu.org> <87tuh4holf.fsf@gnus.org> <822aec9d01909cecfc6c@heytings.org> <87a6iwhltf.fsf@gnus.org> <83tuh4zfg5.fsf@gnu.org> <87y26gfobr.fsf@gnus.org> <87tuh4f1ie.fsf@gnus.org> <0353A9DA-0041-4D71-8E1B-09FB07A5FD0F@acm.org> <87ilxialzw.fsf@igel.home> <831r46wj6r.fsf@gnu.org> <83fssmuxui.fsf@gnu.org> <83bl3aux6y.fsf@gnu.org> <835ytiuvm9.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8754"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: mattiase@acm.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, schwab@linux-m68k.org, stefankangas@gmail.com, raman@google.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 27 21:54:05 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mfozt-00023O-0U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 21:54:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53840 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mfozq-0006W0-UV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 15:54:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38226) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mfoTe-0002sv-BQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 15:20:46 -0400 Original-Received: from heytings.org ([95.142.160.155]:42028) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mfoTc-0004tf-DM; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 15:20:46 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heytings.org; s=20210101; t=1635362442; bh=mgMWd/JCnZxoUYQIEU9xEQX09grsLQaGaxmAqeofwWs=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:References:From; b=FKOpUBGTBkmyDt3nTp1c2GIjE1FHDwX6J4flIEc88m3FJ4u8kfExJ7mbzBSQ1pzwi X0DPsONeMky6EttFnEYvn6MHNZRkChnChFp3E99KJI9tVptK97mc7Z2u+eQF5vZocS 9/P19P4nxkWxnArjHq9Bme1nO5imrnAsALCwbKXX5QIWU9LMFp58jZbbJ8yDDvRFXu KvZdLmjwB57AezqB6PHizcvdIVDsH2mZOGvPHU9uvTd/+ezOjGam51u+ZeOvSdmjBK JHHp5RwZdurzJSXuRKZgeIMVFQLcfC1/GmGIl1IESPsfbyBQpnPWB9xduVTcDcLI+V LhxSwlmR7C9fA== In-Reply-To: <835ytiuvm9.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=95.142.160.155; envelope-from=gregory@heytings.org; helo=heytings.org X-Spam_score_int: -10 X-Spam_score: -1.1 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, PHOTO_EDITING_DIRECT=1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:278050 Archived-At: >> Here they are. One with Noto Sans, one with the free Aegyptus font, >> and one with the latest Aegyptus font. As far as I can see, the X001 >> and Q003 hieroglyphs are (correctly?) combined, which is (I guess) what >> you wanted to see. > > Thanks, but that's not how this is supposed to look. It should look > like here: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_Egypt#Historical_development > > The layout in the vertical direction is completely incorrect in all of > the images you show. Basically, it looks like the vertical layout of > hieroglyphs above other hieroglyphs is either unsupported or doesn't > work. > It should, again if you look at the PDF I linked earlier, you'll see many examples of up to four glyphs combined together, vertically and horizontally. > > Maybe I made mistakes in the composition machinery, and that's why it > doesn't display correctly. But it sounds unlikely, because I see in > your images glyphs that shouldn't be there (they are control characters > which should disappear from display). Or maybe HarfBuzz doesn't yet > support this script well enough. > All this is possible, indeed, and I'd even say probable.