From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: New multi-command facility displays in the wrong echo area. Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2020 15:56:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <20201009163445.GB4027@ACM> <20201009203810.GC4027@ACM> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13205"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier , Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 10 00:57:04 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kR1Ju-0003IL-Qp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 10 Oct 2020 00:57:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37346 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kR1Jt-0002JX-Q7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 18:57:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60626) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kR1J4-0001hk-86 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 18:56:10 -0400 Original-Received: from aserp2130.oracle.com ([141.146.126.79]:50494) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kR1J0-0001gP-Ir for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 18:56:09 -0400 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (aserp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 099MtpXi011370; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 22:56:05 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=mime-version : message-id : date : from : sender : to : cc : subject : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=corp-2020-01-29; bh=R6+3WKmZoizvJkyoHJWphZpGbM2p6e0AWC03wj96P6w=; b=xMCGFGVDn43caNdDj97hGrUCMkRlrnF6PdChf7zEHkijOgK5h+/fDYMtt9nrCnTPUZIR OByVoOgCMS8F6Z1eWSeHaW2d4NwzF5xpzXoFRxnVcxA7syRajjJGp6yBBBpul3YYoDbB 6U0SfzaiNOJPm4zaXC/qxzBzkok+iH6UMtrxzUtg/VV55XfeE0PO/Vbp6rznM4OL1/Qw OIUt/0Z9t7WaPLJCH+M/au1ZyFc9LcmzB/xYLI5lkp5m74+yYgPhtcqt3e7LE0XaqyPI r1TXXmH7AAwj6V3jxTIwGj9TGoUSsfMzXLd26djmEgVGCcPmmT1CHEsMhRO4OVxtYS9b EQ== Original-Received: from aserp3030.oracle.com (aserp3030.oracle.com [141.146.126.71]) by aserp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 342kvyutfc-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 09 Oct 2020 22:56:05 +0000 Original-Received: from pps.filterd (aserp3030.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp3030.oracle.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 099MtRNI161237; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 22:56:04 GMT Original-Received: from userv0121.oracle.com (userv0121.oracle.com [156.151.31.72]) by aserp3030.oracle.com with ESMTP id 342gury24n-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 09 Oct 2020 22:56:04 +0000 Original-Received: from abhmp0014.oracle.com (abhmp0014.oracle.com [141.146.116.20]) by userv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 099Mu22i008853; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 22:56:03 GMT In-Reply-To: X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.9.1 (1003210) [OL 16.0.5056.0 (x86)] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9769 signatures=668681 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxlogscore=999 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2010090172 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=6000 definitions=9769 signatures=668681 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1015 phishscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 impostorscore=0 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2010090172 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=141.146.126.79; envelope-from=drew.adams@oracle.com; helo=aserp2130.oracle.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/10/09 17:06:05 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.1-3.10 [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:257286 Archived-At: > make isearch signal > an error in that case. You'd get an error if isearch used a minibuffer > (because it'd be a recursive minibuffer which are disallowed by > default), and whether isearch uses a minibuffer or not is (to a large > extent) an internal implementation detail. Not sure it's the same thing, but if you're also saying that it should be an error to use a recursive _edit_ during Isearch then I disagree with that. I have Isearch keys that open a recursive edit. (And a recursive edit could use a minibuffer and even recursive minibuffers.)