From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tweaking t-m-m to make room for d-s-m Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 02:08:15 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87sk7pzqsp.fsf@ambire.localdomain> <20100326092833.19294vuz9efv5qg4@webmail.mnet-online.de> <33DBCF2DFF71401DB0861E66EC29ED2B@us.oracle.com> <5F1D87251C98412EADC1187ABFCC3E8D@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1269907733 6890 80.91.229.12 (30 Mar 2010 00:08:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 00:08:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: mathias@mnet-mail.de, dak@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 30 02:08:48 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NwP0g-0002qr-3U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 02:08:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58805 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NwP0f-0002yk-I1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 20:08:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NwP0b-0002yb-8o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 20:08:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=60748 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NwP0Y-0002yL-OD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 20:08:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NwP0W-0006cK-MN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 20:08:38 -0400 Original-Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.157]:40682) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NwP0W-0006c2-Gp; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 20:08:36 -0400 Original-Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so2735236fgb.12 for ; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:08:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:received:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=g2XRk3lI+37GWgQkwCyRL21lGJfwgMyBC9gi+9KSbmU=; b=HALvE4vcPP3ylPaWqd84BUA2zHrbb5yID2qhnfifgBAfXHnHa30gVBovGdmDdirHb+ JN2njniNG32R0MWk6C4eUvsC9eKPPYBSakWOf5pNtaMESoSr2YZVAda5Z6DbiEl+Q9bZ arBso5xyk8F6+ED7ti06XyJyQ0mnI3WPN464E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=RwEbx/qEVX4PScWe36dpNlSaQKa5f/7JdQmSOHkObFUPi87IAO5u7tX4S0ZIEE2mdG 3qAaLnOleqIttNWxnNGyL2Kloin33x9TLlJdSYqhOIkgnZE7a+NHs2EDlRTAJUzbrt3d xbqUHQsYRSRljiDpLTsjLTW004s9lZHByDyVc= Original-Received: by 10.239.169.18 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:08:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Original-Received: by 10.239.162.200 with SMTP id m8mr20639hbd.21.1269907715120; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:08:35 -0700 (PDT) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:122892 Archived-At: On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 1:38 AM, Richard Stallman wrote: > =C2=A0 =C2=A0Thanks, I forgot. But is there any good reason to use C-z al= so on > =C2=A0 =C2=A0window systems? Why not let it be undo there since that is t= he most > =C2=A0 =C2=A0common use (as far as I know)? > > Undo can be done under X windows using C-/, which is just as easy > to type as C-z. No, I do not think so for several reasons: - It is not as easy to type for `undo' if your are used to using C-z for th= at. - It is not necessarily as easy to type on an international keyboard.