From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Next pretest Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 22:48:22 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87d3youv09.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <6A823839B829453CA20FA61AE9FEB9D1@us.oracle.com> <2AD8CA38CEF34D3E8BC6E8859183A4C9@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1269809364 8147 80.91.229.12 (28 Mar 2010 20:49:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 20:49:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , Sean Sieger , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 28 22:49:14 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NvzPj-0002Nd-9N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 22:49:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57525 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NvzPg-0000Nv-Uk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 16:48:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NvzPa-0000LR-Ft for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 16:48:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38708 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NvzPZ-0000JZ-4j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 16:48:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NvzPX-0000Bm-8F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 16:48:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-fx0-f224.google.com ([209.85.220.224]:60544) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NvzPX-0000Be-1c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 16:48:43 -0400 Original-Received: by fxm24 with SMTP id 24so107178fxm.26 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 13:48:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:received:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=HFduSfbVw982eIc0mByIBL0Z4fajAgIL//tSB36GwZM=; b=pEprdT7rMicZOPXiYEgQxAZYHFViNPMQpNRCfeyZ7ljQN66vq0ycmTpdgtSL4Jc/hj r6ZhmOWxkwCbc+k6iJpRPZHRNM9i1AGhckeculMSIllLdViouRi0xr6uT8AZDNs0Rkxl zq0nP400+tG7s0itnvZIEkdMwKmAHvSNIj8+k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=XpbWWkIZanOgZBHwv3yYT+y8POq9t7e/jOKfUYSoNz70Sa+qu8txuNUs2Ihmj/3A3M IfQqM1Q5zPjLSZ+qgEX/lvwRrvVcXHo9Egebjr2q4A9CvlDB3K1XokynTX0OALmngL4u /MIm5DpgWowuKV3R4hF1f5XfFraM6f2GoiyJI= Original-Received: by 10.239.140.200 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 13:48:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2AD8CA38CEF34D3E8BC6E8859183A4C9@us.oracle.com> Original-Received: by 10.239.137.11 with SMTP id j11mr343670hbj.177.1269809322126; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 13:48:42 -0700 (PDT) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:122820 Archived-At: On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Drew Adams wrote: >> >> I would like to make the next pretest release (23.1.95) this coming >> >> Friday, the 2nd of April. =C2=A0Let me know if there are no >> >> objections, or any problems that you'd like to see addressed. >> > >> > How about a Windows binary? >> >> I will be away. However I could perhaps upload something now to my >> site instead. How about that? > > Every little bit helps, of course. Thanks, Lennart. > ... > And pretest binaries should correspond to the pretest source code exactly= . > Otherwise, we can be comparing apples and oranges (which can mean confusi= on and > more work for everyone involved). Thanks. I am including a file with something like this now: ;; bzr checkout info for Emacs unpatched version (defconst emacs-trunk-bzr-revision-id "schwab@linux-m68k.org-20100321115749-axlxbdz2vt3sdbf6") (defconst emacs-trunk-bzr-revno 99712) (defconst emacs-trunk-bzr-date "2010-03-21 12:57:49 +0100") (defconst emacs-trunk-bzr-branch-nick "trunk") I suggested that should be recommended in the build process and included in bug reports, but I got no responce. > And `report-emacs-bug' should correctly address the pretest mailing list = (that > didn't happen the last time you made a binary available informally for pr= etest > testing). I have forgotten. Was I using the wrong branch, or?