From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tweaking t-m-m to make room for d-s-m Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 23:33:54 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87sk7pzqsp.fsf@ambire.localdomain> <20100326092833.19294vuz9efv5qg4@webmail.mnet-online.de> <33DBCF2DFF71401DB0861E66EC29ED2B@us.oracle.com> <5F1D87251C98412EADC1187ABFCC3E8D@us.oracle.com> <4BAD2F8C.7050701@canaxis.org> <777851FC04B349D6B6B36B998FC3127C@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1269643100 23546 80.91.229.12 (26 Mar 2010 22:38:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 22:38:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Christophe Poncy , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 26 23:38:16 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NvIAR-0006dW-Dx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 23:38:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53586 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NvIAQ-0004fI-Sg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:38:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NvI6b-0001V8-KR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:34:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55888 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NvI6a-0001US-JH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:34:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NvI6Z-0001Oh-CM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:34:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-fx0-f224.google.com ([209.85.220.224]:45484) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NvI6Z-0001OZ-5V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:34:15 -0400 Original-Received: by fxm24 with SMTP id 24so25641fxm.26 for ; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:34:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:received:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=0Wgfu+LMstD8148EKsONvPXVgBV/pKrMu/wmnRrrkvA=; b=yHiJTx5psxonsdqHZes9yHQ/PGV2W4tssfkMGZ6Ex/Nkx6WiWBgdazFWVLKS1zdEaO K7r727ZBKPH1h30x70Wv4gEDsWxZafB+iTDU3cpeNyNoy7FfYsmCP1o7GkS9ZqD5dC5n +Uxl5KfLpzCTWCI1kWM737fXiT2r3xb92rZl4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=ZpRRp9YED2KYfzH8rgrK8l6Q7ceRY+/rQhsv72APPCLETKPDn3rQdzgkF3tjYj/bO8 B+46E2jsJxpv6GcPUKvEMgSlUTL43ycUF1ifWJBbAjbKtOo9fNSgh5zjCOO/5iji4guY 8zLMFJ/Yp09GiQL17CjwQcUkg6U4HntPnYdKc= Original-Received: by 10.239.141.72 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:33:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <777851FC04B349D6B6B36B998FC3127C@us.oracle.com> Original-Received: by 10.239.182.210 with SMTP id r18mr155555hbg.54.1269642854263; Fri, 26 Mar 2010 15:34:14 -0700 (PDT) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:122736 Archived-At: On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Drew Adams wrote: > > FWIW, I know and use CUA bindings much of the day, most days - in Framemaker and > Windows, in particular. I still prefer not to use cua-mode in Emacs. Emacs is > not Framemaker, Word, Windows, DOS,... > > Do I bother to switch back and forth like that just because I got in the Emacs > habit? I can't prove the contrary. I admit that I knew Emacs before the others, > and I haven't tried to use Emacs in Viper mode or CUA mode. But I like to think > that I do this switch-dance because Emacs keys fit better with Emacs. Why not try cua-mode? I was very doubtful myself from the beginning, but it works surpricingly well IMO.