From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug#5765: Strange things happens with C-v in read-file-name Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 02:17:49 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87eij9r6hu.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87iq8l1mbc.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1269479913 29195 80.91.229.12 (25 Mar 2010 01:18:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 01:18:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 5765@debbugs.gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 25 02:18:26 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NubiL-0001TX-Bu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 02:18:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54624 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NubiK-0003Oy-Ok for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 21:18:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NubiA-0003Mt-VO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 21:18:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59992 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nubi7-0003Lx-RW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 21:18:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nubi6-0003oJ-Cd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 21:18:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-fx0-f225.google.com ([209.85.220.225]:58257) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nubi6-0003oB-5q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 21:18:10 -0400 Original-Received: by fxm25 with SMTP id 25so68523fxm.26 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:18:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=YeZsOQntjU0fvU1gFqnA2eKUUpPkhdOw1U25rHH76+A=; b=tqC6WUzCeIvchjeXYs2HXvSi7rkVKo7SsqWljoJDQuI9EykyjgdxsvnWiDt64PylLs /g8Ht93bGhD63lcbV17Q84SH/32XkBXVjBtSHphEuQIYqXRBwZENa8zRgLvxVWQ4dSV1 K8fdKLISnN+f5uE0HmQBS2fTivAqQzGtJDIiA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=dlHx5Q3galvCbLdNN/WI1g/oAjX9yrG5mVAGHQSdM1ECYTAhIfill6ppGEP9ilM9YG m2/JHHAUBuBQziJKiqW7DXLCyI1O877fYJ6JTXUpK37E5E/fNxgAFSH1VVBeMWgk9Czp zgSHh58kOS4p0BQi81gbwofcllWc+fBJajrcE= Original-Received: by 10.239.162.210 with SMTP id m18mr509519hbd.189.1269479889147; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:18:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87iq8l1mbc.fsf@stupidchicken.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:122631 Archived-At: On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Chong Yidong wrote= : > Lennart Borgman writes: > >>> Please bisect your customizations to find the minimally reproducible >>> test case. >> >> I have not been able to do that. However I know that I get the same >> problem with for example >> >> =C2=A0 M-: (completing-read "my prompt: " '("a" "b")) >> >> I can't find any involved variable that looks suspect. Could you maybe >> come up with something to check? > > If this is so simple to reproduce with customizations, I don't see why > it should be so difficult to bisect the customizations and find the > problem. =C2=A0It's far easier than asking others to deduce the bug from > first principles. Of course I have tried that, but I could not find the problem. I needed to do certain things after to make it happens. Now I think I have found the problem. In ido-minibuffer-setup (in ido.el) there is a line (setq cua-inhibit-cua-keys t) I have had that commented out for long in my patched version of Emacs, but forgot to tell about it. Some merging breaked this. I see no reason why it should be there. Could it please be removed (or commented out) if no one else sees a reason for it? (Then we have to find another way to solve this bug.)