From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: custom-reevaluate-setting / custom-initialize-delay Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:46:32 +0100 Message-ID: References: <64d3zvx1zi.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83fx4rn5y9.fsf@gnu.org> <83bpffmfnn.fsf@gnu.org> <952172E697BE405E9B53E39C2520F80F@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1267004830 29951 80.91.229.12 (24 Feb 2010 09:47:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:47:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 24 10:47:06 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NkDph-0006kw-U8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:47:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52375 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NkDpg-0006PF-Bj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 04:47:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NkDpZ-0006P9-Fo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 04:46:57 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42537 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NkDpY-0006P1-H3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 04:46:56 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NkDpX-0004Wl-7z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 04:46:56 -0500 Original-Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.157]:2214) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NkDpX-0004WY-3S; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 04:46:55 -0500 Original-Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e21so197344fga.12 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 01:46:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=FzHnpnKsmKJMjOExhaJs94nmpc3Xl9pahX3ZivAWzOI=; b=DISyCrNid8mGR3UpdNZFBtl/uAzhE1JV7XJLRppPGcrVrF8bW1ChiaeO9gql6pgjax vd3kHXneuG4bFQOUvcUARRz+eBVmj5KerBspGvoHVpOKpuw6dl2vEaQqX+brm/esTycK s678c3vk0xiOtJLXPQu30zax5MnMpC03+hamo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=R/ojIqUpNNqmBIMmGOD/5cAsnO1MCzCW6adVoFsP6S6E4PujSli53oJ5A9JsnGemxJ n/HkY0nYpu3Jw5cO9gx0ciYmQ7ND0YYhs8BIjM+cd74zVqNpqUgqwftWwH0BV2+XOt2a hVrTzTx1rz7lcIYKnMk9L5znUjcNutXhpl/eg= Original-Received: by 10.239.189.76 with SMTP id s12mr1876289hbh.111.1267004813677; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 01:46:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <952172E697BE405E9B53E39C2520F80F@us.oracle.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121330 Archived-At: On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:26 AM, Drew Adams wrote: >> Yep, that's the ticket. It restores the Emacs 23.1 (and Emacs >> 22) behavior. > > (Needless to say, I hope, that this should be the out-of-the-box behavior, as > before. Users should not need to set such variables themselves.) Of course sending bug reports should work out-of-the-box. If we ever get a test suite Emacs this is the first thing that should be tested.