From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Thrashing [was: Surely 'bzr branch' shouldn't be this slow?] Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 21:20:03 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20100103174743.GB1653@muc.de> <4B448FF5.5060900@gnu.org> <87hbqze39u.fsf@telefonica.net> <83637fccsz.fsf@gnu.org> <87d41m740k.GNU's_Not_Unix!%yavor@gnu.org> <873a2hc0bl.GNU's_Not_Unix!%yavor@gnu.org> <87ocl5k6ff.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262895827 477 80.91.229.12 (7 Jan 2010 20:23:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 20:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Yavor Doganov , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 07 21:23:39 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NSytI-0001Ed-Kz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 21:23:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50714 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NSytD-0005jl-LH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:23:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NSyqP-0001xr-9W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:20:33 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NSyqK-0001qk-AN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:20:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39445 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NSyqK-0001qX-41 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:20:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-fx0-f228.google.com ([209.85.220.228]:48266) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NSyqH-0006QJ-Mq; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:20:25 -0500 Original-Received: by fxm28 with SMTP id 28so9927586fxm.26 for ; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 12:20:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qlqkXK1JYUfS8WJo16faw9EFVPES/jS5TL0tGrxNwMw=; b=BORPEoMDTN1UvMLOflulbnVY7MBWdDxUo/p3MR+fqhVidFfcj5BrPq8T9JzxMgB9Zw 1bLCHxpXFDr5FFE/kYNBQ6b7CdSekCJvQUeG7OxSNdlAopLtBQFMs80+ZJl9TDguZbDb mdQ6mWF5HjQanUD9c0Q9o2CwIinAtpxG1ooGE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=GaD3JcqwgldmPXahS6HsbsH9Hja3pM6RJXZIsVnNnTpRvkeR0B0zP3KSyL2LhyFpW7 WYPoTeSfZtTlzGzGV7hUy61FTNOVSniOw7NjL9do5ok376ARmURzF1Yjq5dy44EkckRp GQrzGmJrVtt5xoIFTS6QWBpWBLhuFN0fOI+bI= Original-Received: by 10.239.163.225 with SMTP id q33mr828907hbd.137.1262895624164; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 12:20:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87ocl5k6ff.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119617 Archived-At: On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wr= ote: > Lennart Borgman writes: > > =C2=A0> Is it the design or the algorithm that are the problem? > > Neither. =C2=A0It's Intel advertising that makes people think that GHz ar= e > as useful as GB. =C2=A0If you have a choice to make between buying more G= Hz > and buying more GB, as a rule of thumb you won't go wrong by taking > the latter. Are you saying the algorithm is future proof? ;-)