From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Surely 'bzr branch' shouldn't be this slow? Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 09:37:15 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20100103174743.GB1653@muc.de> <87bphbhxxt.fsf@telefonica.net> <20100106131039.GB2447@muc.de> <4B448FF5.5060900@gnu.org> <87hbqze39u.fsf@telefonica.net> <83637fccsz.fsf@gnu.org> <87d41m740k.GNU's_Not_Unix!%yavor@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262854708 12453 80.91.229.12 (7 Jan 2010 08:58:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 08:58:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 07 09:58:22 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NSoCD-0008Sr-RL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 09:58:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58512 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NSoCE-0004Rb-AG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 03:58:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NSnsC-00048d-GD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 03:37:40 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NSnsA-000482-9z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 03:37:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45129 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NSns9-00047t-6B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 03:37:37 -0500 Original-Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.158]:59543) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NSns8-0000gR-RG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 03:37:37 -0500 Original-Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so7175415fgg.12 for ; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 00:37:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=PrEz4Ya6UFbGCU2yfmyUYQPR9MyDPdjpKjLSqcW2oNU=; b=srWPF7lcOXsz2KjKBXHdSfTm44dvVPAJtTm2THRRWQaxHgMjksiKV6utbaEZSwcKQg U/Cet4U2bwmrnKGe94EvCgxiHwNv+Zlfj2zPG5esrq5Mq0f/UWwCn29025PspOhIzMWB lu4QaaWdKhMCHAgY6BMWFHTJuBmnlw2jSLL94= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=s9lkn89OP/XrOCdwqqqWSbRoYZBXLEDJ0cBo1otFUfWOeLkKIUOQWvB85RT7W1VR+e 3FfWTvBtScEL+e0gxzNAjDFjYzmDHQWAquhj8MY6HPM4PGeGLIWbiGXOIFRfzcUgq6G4 qZAeOzFbcX234PygByJIV9litFV3cKvDOOCxM= Original-Received: by 10.239.167.129 with SMTP id g1mr639535hbe.177.1262853455076; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 00:37:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87d41m740k.GNU's_Not_Unix!%yavor@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119561 Archived-At: On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Yavor Doganov wrote: > Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> I don't think the time it takes to make the original branch (or a >> branch outside the shared repo) is CPU-bound. > > It certainly is! =C2=A0I've been fighting for 3 days now to branch on one > of my most powerful machines at home (AMD Duron 1.3 GHz, 500 MB RAM) > without success, and I gave up today. =C2=A0Both sftp/http methods get > stuck around 275/300 MB, and the machine is experiencing sky high > loads; I can't even login. =C2=A0I'm tired of killing bzr and restarting > the process; it always fails. > > At work, on a Pentium IV 2 GHz/1G RAM it took me about an hour and a > half with a slower connection. > > I guess if I compress the shared repo and scp it to my home machine, > it would work, right? Just a comment: I have not even tried yet to use bzr. According to what I am reading it looks impossible at the moment. Am I right or?