From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bad choice of license in BzrForEmacsDevs Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:52:04 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87d4399auk.fsf@red-bean.com> <87hbsl7wr0.fsf@vh213601.truman.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1259185976 6641 80.91.229.12 (25 Nov 2009 21:52:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:52:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jay.p.belanger@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 25 22:52:50 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NDPn7-0000ZE-SK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:52:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35833 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NDPn7-0005JQ-JR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:52:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NDPmq-0005C0-2B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:52:32 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NDPml-00059x-Eg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:52:31 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33331 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NDPml-00059q-8u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:52:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-yw0-f172.google.com ([209.85.211.172]:36551) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NDPmi-0004jn-Px; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 16:52:25 -0500 Original-Received: by ywh2 with SMTP id 2so148939ywh.27 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:52:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=SfwATIUWlW2uBXGxTjuq+830oSttswpbXXNManpkugE=; b=NIaKLn3MBGcM0waMYBUI/Z3nchiRcAk4A2IgmaUrxzg4pzjp0Ek2ojDcS4ay81DbN7 OkUrSoikbrvITp6cUnh29luYtQqSwVsLHAUNHkV4oxRi4NaRW4ZAd++28vHADFqoWkJ+ yBMlpItchWqTUehVNjFOZl+vOx+fUZFjqSlFc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=yCsvPEGDTla/4Q/vS7qT67rlEigyNoQb5uaB59+UUOCxramwBPXRmTb4m3QhWCJ7Uu 5NrTCTR8Qtxc+chRxatj6F18s9BkF32fDazut+LzjzIjrJJI0nNC1cJ+xGxasRTNq2lg aIGPHwcPCetIeBP7G89MifcAexI0ivOHz6y9o= Original-Received: by 10.101.61.20 with SMTP id o20mr6071620ank.166.1259185944072; Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:52:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:117774 Archived-At: Could you please answer on the devel list? Or aren't you subscribed there? On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> In addition, I wonder about the other pages in that wiki have a >> similar license. =C2=A0Are there programs in the wiki which are licensed >> this way, allowing GPLv2 and not GPLv3? > >> That would be a bad problem. =C2=A0Can someone tell me if there are any? > > There might be some, but if they rely on Emacs-23 features, such a licens= e > would be illegal, AFAIK. > > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Stefan > > >