From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Backward completions Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:36:49 +0100 Message-ID: References: <61C01A08-8FB6-4908-B9F1-B9F1CE3E3D92@gmail.com> <20091111212658.GD12012@headley> <87fx8kjosa.fsf_-_@mail.jurta.org> <7b501d5c0911120209x7c8f493fm68fadef6f1311206@mail.gmail.com> <87bpj16pkh.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87tywsz9lb.fsf_-_@mail.jurta.org> <33D4DB11B8C64C4CBF50DEDCA3CE7932@us.oracle.com> <87k4xn4tmz.fsf@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1258573199 9578 80.91.229.12 (18 Nov 2009 19:39:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 19:39:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Drew Adams , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 18 20:39:52 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NAqNZ-0006Ka-RL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:39:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54138 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NAqNZ-0006pA-Eq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:39:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NAqL5-00044X-MO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:37:15 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NAqL1-0003yR-4S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:37:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47505 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NAqL0-0003yF-HH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:37:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-yw0-f194.google.com ([209.85.211.194]:48275) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NAqL0-0003zW-2r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:37:10 -0500 Original-Received: by ywh32 with SMTP id 32so2607221ywh.14 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:37:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=Gw+amJL7fQeTG36L3y6wJfaJpwOh4MrmaOJHFwas+rE=; b=FCreBPDXWX8v1xcrXNNY9m6oe9w1Nyl+lFK7B8xvDpYcTjCktP7OHe5RymZFoJvLiG r8PSNvQuhEwGBwKzRBTKMs5PAUeB6OlAOGJe2ewC7rVraXomgStDV4AplkelBdJeUaup Gd18kBX+RNhEjUXD3nXvrVLJZjhd8FP/6OUms= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=gIGlDleZiSzF3EkI9gIWn01Wni8tzX40HwBWFTfx8zzGNbtQN6kviRnF08Oqn9N9eh QrmDudQgV36mkSXt4q3BcItr7w9KTjpIWI4QcJ9PUGos+5qw8odbPWQkRRkMj76gIMrK 632cZty1FmLtQMRhI1N6h6PO8VlZLXg3FjFVg= Original-Received: by 10.101.106.9 with SMTP id i9mr859376anm.128.1258573029136; Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:37:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87k4xn4tmz.fsf@mail.jurta.org> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:117214 Archived-At: On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Juri Linkov wrote: >>>> The following patch binds to `minibuffer-complete-backward' >>> >>> I wish you wouldn't do that - just a wish. is essentially S-TAB. I >>> would prefer that Emacs leave TAB combinations alone, so that users and >>> libraries can make use of them without stepping on standard bindings. >> >> This is used extensively in org-mode. > > For minibuffer completions? Eh, sorry ... ;-) >>> FWIW, C-v and M-v make more sense (yes, in the minibuffer too) for scrolling >>> completions than do TAB and . >> >> Page Up/Down? > > and M-v are bound to `switch-to-completions', so they can't be used > for scrolling. But normal scrolling keys would be more convenient for scrolling, wouldn't they?