From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Completions in Semantic Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:37:13 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87tyxwxq6t.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <1255924220.6961.1039.camel@projectile.siege-engine.com> <1255969613.6961.1056.camel@projectile.siege-engine.com> <1255980824.6961.1075.camel@projectile.siege-engine.com> <1255990628.6961.1084.camel@projectile.siege-engine.com> <20091030211717.GF8401@c3po.kitp.ucsb.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1256938679 32269 80.91.229.12 (30 Oct 2009 21:37:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:37:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Stefan Monnier , Drew Adams , eric@siege-engine.com To: Toby Cubitt , Nikolaj Schumacher Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 30 22:37:51 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1N3zAF-0004DJ-KK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:37:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45973 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N3zAF-0007GP-5R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:37:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N3zAA-0007Fb-F5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:37:38 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N3zA6-0007Ed-Ua for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:37:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53333 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N3zA6-0007EY-R7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:37:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-gx0-f224.google.com ([209.85.217.224]:59435) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N3zA6-0003U6-JC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:37:34 -0400 Original-Received: by gxk24 with SMTP id 24so8545765gxk.6 for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:37:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=Rvpt4MkqtaNfvGwUwOI7mO07Szq6dpR2Ro0JSOCgMhQ=; b=IqS0a12Io/P+xzdrraAwaFfUm2xcTa2AMTtESEtdeLtKvsG8QO+XNlyfHBuD5VVsis SpKrMoexBZLg7jkFjJMdn8knh7paW8suiFVMCfuaMcNPV9yqNXuiTg9CjG7voDf5Ustu gXWUat7XxI0CVn8KI0P3ryhdM9ZvkpVcWckbU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=Mxi2nZHpz0DlbawJd1Gf5Tlz61KMbAY51auN3R6c0xAs8fLxftbwVJlkYZt7179SGF XdULVRHc2zhHmzC26VXN0mZUMXRN43oMY5gt/rgQEH/M7nuEparxA3OivIPXDAtRN3Ez vD2bbFySsGbIiU/3ybWfQ0mhGeQqzVX4ehB8I= Original-Received: by 10.101.11.11 with SMTP id o11mr2417734ani.19.1256938653499; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:37:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20091030211717.GF8401@c3po.kitp.ucsb.edu> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:116480 Archived-At: On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 10:17 PM, Toby Cubitt wrote: > > I had a discussion a couple of years ago (more?) with RMS about > submitting completion-UI for inclusion in Emacs, which led me to rework > parts of it based on his suggestions. By the end of the discussion, it > was in a state that RMS was happy with. > > However, it was in the middle of the version 22 feature freeze, and I > promised to submit it for possible inclusion after the end of the > freeze. There were three reasons I never got around to it: 1) I forgot, > 2) I still wasn't quite happy with the code, and 3) I hadn't documented > it (other than docstrings). Since then, I've at least fixed 2) so that > the code is much cleaner and clearer. I still haven't fixed 3). > > But maybe it's time I put completion-UI up for inclusion, and if it's > favourably received it might give me the incentive to document it > properly... As you know I think a framework like completion-UI och company-mode should be included in Emacs. However I suggest that you and Nikolaj try to merge your frameworks first if it is possible.