From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why js2-mode in Emacs 23.2? Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:37:38 +0200 Message-ID: References: <7b501d5c0908091634ndfba631vd9db6502db301097@mail.gmail.com> <5683A82C-C186-45EB-9290-76F87859E353@merrillpress.com> <485b0c380908100705p7ef073b8n74283737ff295e0b@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1249915114 26980 80.91.229.12 (10 Aug 2009 14:38:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 14:38:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Daniel Colascione , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stephen Eilert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 10 16:38:26 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MaW14-0002rX-GR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:38:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57171 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MaW12-0004fy-6F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:38:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MaW0Q-0004fW-L8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:37:46 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MaW0K-0004dg-JV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:37:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49056 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MaW0J-0004dO-SP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:37:40 -0400 Original-Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.242]:14322) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MaW0J-0005rF-Fa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:37:39 -0400 Original-Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b6so1152197ana.21 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:37:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+ZSQCXaRgc3cWwhifj97rBcIIjj93DEnO5VMpsdQrTM=; b=aaJFI4ysQt+DFkC4U40iI16Vd0r9xrq1HHZSyodd8PJL2uUjd0NS4zy1vIdhmkL8cd vrNcb3MG0umEWJJKrKvE4R+xBvT/edK9g7cf08Yp5vpS38sxxgx6oZv+jnepg/Kdbrgj 4BOYJoHj7PLbzKoykrp02llHlclqBBYSP7A2U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=bzIj/d2+VVQ2OzSzhzrkdC0zi5PiKwmgPqNzn5dBAHcnWOduGY9cS/fT43Do8mAsbn bGs4dXYsqxApcVO0+08dG978bxE7QKAoxPUFHGutqLrayS2d79t2TBC8lHrwF16wjY1z 1F84dW3hw6p9YNJHP79l9LwZWnRrSSV/njmm0= Original-Received: by 10.100.174.20 with SMTP id w20mr3671362ane.65.1249915058972; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 07:37:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <485b0c380908100705p7ef073b8n74283737ff295e0b@mail.gmail.com> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:113966 Archived-At: On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Stephen Eilert wrote: > I do not think that was done without a very good reason (and there's a > lengthy post explaining it), unless the author is a complete masochist. > > This is most likely pointing out serious deficiencies in Emacs > infrastructure that have been neglected. Where is that post?