From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why js2-mode in Emacs 23.2? Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 05:27:53 +0200 Message-ID: References: <7b501d5c0908091634ndfba631vd9db6502db301097@mail.gmail.com> <5683A82C-C186-45EB-9290-76F87859E353@merrillpress.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1249874919 19603 80.91.229.12 (10 Aug 2009 03:28:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 03:28:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Leo , Deniz Dogan , Daniel Colascione , Stefan Monnier , Emacs-Devel devel To: Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 10 05:28:31 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MaLYk-0004AW-WA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 05:28:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36782 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MaLYk-0003zQ-Ds for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Aug 2009 23:28:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MaLYH-0003mf-6K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Aug 2009 23:28:01 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MaLYC-0003ij-JJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Aug 2009 23:28:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40734 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MaLYC-0003ia-Cr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Aug 2009 23:27:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yx0-f172.google.com ([209.85.210.172]:64811) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MaLYA-0008FO-S1; Sun, 09 Aug 2009 23:27:55 -0400 Original-Received: by yxe2 with SMTP id 2so3789521yxe.14 for ; Sun, 09 Aug 2009 20:27:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=OqbFGzFBPuCrzuKvsQhvwC/VyIQnH6Pjb1G2VQDVxvw=; b=BaDHoju7l3RrMSfbz0tYO5aaB5bQHNDvpWDSqq+tOnM/XPU5bQpZvSRfmnPO2jWr5h BGNWmxwVXmxUESCuDKci04Od77FkcILXIyVPDKGAoQzGMtwFFewPsCDOjWNZk2gXi9Qk 4lkRspAPPoyRVFcWoUtxzcnR/IFZXQHbxL/5E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=NIyzfZzUoZo5Gv+pXpYmZXJkf6CHS5/MbwLMCpv98ffWaFIqDtgaccFoBmUmxqbEne 5u4XvoqrBkGgb9uHSQ2+1O1/j/yOjac84ANm2tN6QnEz3739AR6abW5g+HVumuwqO0VA zScOAL8uxDWI2NZ1noWdxgqUToyhcUX+/bt1E= Original-Received: by 10.100.252.13 with SMTP id z13mr2965353anh.24.1249874873961; Sun, 09 Aug 2009 20:27:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:113936 Archived-At: On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 5:24 AM, Miles Bader wrote: > Stefan Monnier writes: >> So I do believe js2-mode is maintained. =C2=A0Also, while it it unusual, >> I think it's a very interesting experiment in how Emacs could evolve >> (similarly to CEDET). > > "Evolve"? =C2=A0Is js2-mode's roll-everything-from-scratch code better th= an > the existing infrastructure that it ignores (e.g. font-lock)? Someone made nxml-mode use (a bit of) font-lock. Can't the same be made for= js2?