From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Infrastructural complexity. Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 16:22:00 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20090712180623.GA1009@muc.de> <87skgwb9na.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87ab34ti2o.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <4A61D2A5.8080504@gmx.at> <87vdlpfun0.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <4A62F79A.90001@gmx.at> <873a8s5wwm.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <873a8s2rqu.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <4A6439B4.8010409@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1248099751 23547 80.91.229.12 (20 Jul 2009 14:22:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 14:22:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juri Linkov , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 20 16:22:24 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MStl0-0001Zp-Uq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 16:22:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37179 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MStl0-000654-C9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 10:22:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MStkk-0005zO-JE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 10:22:06 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MStkf-0005xW-Uy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 10:22:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46122 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MStkf-0005xQ-QA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 10:22:01 -0400 Original-Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.240]:24633) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MStkf-0007pP-8x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 10:22:01 -0400 Original-Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b6so2340344ana.21 for ; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 07:22:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+AhbzwM0z7tHqfcyBDbnFuUuYsfuHUqT+FLC+qJKif4=; b=s+sSaM4IOvb9Vt0IOs995v+EnD48b5rqR5nFsQa2q0moBQkIJcJpBDyfsvK1xBontP gfBd9UUUEHWCHbEIR8oXQkTKc/gcOepOGXRSyh15xWFvNQaYIJQxV5S99Y1vC+XIO+qH gRLZYDOJGnnbl0xAzP9MEGIajxOvjwH7VAw2Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=xgFvh5TWwzEJzrmkRxLVhFWwdbifEIUlIgOv2QtP2G/AuTGXFN6QTcW0bT3z4M4+H8 iaxYWB9i5uTwbLJcuCOh2x2navxDrtXnqqPuKvonN3+C5RrOLvpGZk5iklDgVGFR5MY0 VkptFpMlgBbrZ2+h9jun8NaRLJBaP2KaLT0q0= Original-Received: by 10.100.121.12 with SMTP id t12mr6219970anc.58.1248099720204; Mon, 20 Jul 2009 07:22:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A6439B4.8010409@gmx.at> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:112829 Archived-At: On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:32 AM, martin rudalics wrote: >>> As I said before, I have code for that in winsav.el. It needs a bit >>> better integration with desktop.el currently, but it works. >> >> BTW, do you now have a fix to the problem of breaking the 'window >> property of overlays when restoring windows? > > There's no easy fix for that unless you scan all overlays in all live > buffers to check whether they have a 'window property. =C2=A0More than 99= % of > overlays do not have a 'window property so this introduces considerable > overhead with hardly any benefits. I believe saving them this way does not make sense. It kind of assume that the user has created them which we know nothing about. I think it is better to think of them just as font-lock faces. We do not save that, it is recreated autmoatically (if we recreate the state).