From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Symbol's function definition is void: < Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 21:20:56 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4A44BAB6.7050903@online.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1246044103 21901 80.91.229.12 (26 Jun 2009 19:21:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:21:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Roehler Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 26 21:21:36 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MKGzP-00042i-CN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 21:21:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57234 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MKGzO-0002uO-PK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:21:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MKGyr-00029t-Uy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:21:02 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MKGyo-00021t-12 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:21:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59323 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MKGyn-00021d-Oc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:20:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f217.google.com ([209.85.218.217]:56218) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MKGyn-0007rE-EQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:20:57 -0400 Original-Received: by bwz17 with SMTP id 17so2683052bwz.42 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:20:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=EGVDcVSEjVHRxlUeiPs9DzYFcmxQRneO/nkLgY1ZOhE=; b=sX9YCtIbmQgdsqjDXG/DCARHObG/+Ds8+IpnRCJCEJizQ5dxVRjUFcpu6ObfQ7u9GV srsV+II7Xv72FliAK1e1nivXh5ma4qHj/+2YNWHG15jQGfSYyC0FEEgv1BOP/2JIo1Ge AX8mXPK0GCojONFR2l6XMZUJPfWMbTAe6vysU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ESv9F8vlYgU1rrTw0tBn66wPcE0pOcX5c5pYbxhruNDQqeJnD9sxLZBGnczsy73TRk Mx2ecBt8OJNSyw9ao89h2F9UvOkghSvCiVNd5H1rdKRr8x56lQX1BDuSNnqVq29psZY0 QOR28TL7sso9Uut4ncU3ocnYBL0mJWS/Eo2+o= Original-Received: by 10.239.177.73 with SMTP id u9mr328224hbf.127.1246044056193; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:20:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A44BAB6.7050903@online.de> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:111753 Archived-At: On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Andreas Roehler wrote: > Lennart Borgman wrote: >> I have got a strange bug report for nXhtml. The report says that < is >> not defined. Please see >> >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/NxhtmlMode#toc13 >> >> What functions could make < void? fset? >> >> >> > > Encountering that error from time to time, reason here is regulary: > > a crashed beginning-of-buffer command --wrongly typed-- left a "<", which= was saved > =C2=A0when closing Emacs. > > If I start Emacs again, that error is signaled. > > So sorry, should I'm be the only stupid one doing such things. > > But, earnestly, would expect just this reason for the OP. Andreas, could you please explain what you did? I do not understand.