From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Desktop uses emacs-mule for desktop file Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 16:56:45 +0200 Message-ID: References: <46023.130.55.118.19.1241621533.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1241622326 6487 80.91.229.12 (6 May 2009 15:05:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 15:05:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs-Devel devel To: herring@lanl.gov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 06 17:05:17 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1M1igL-0002R6-E5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 May 2009 17:05:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47410 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M1igK-0002x2-Qb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 May 2009 11:05:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M1iYJ-0008Db-NF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 May 2009 10:56:55 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1M1iYF-0008Bz-TW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 May 2009 10:56:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47635 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1M1iYF-0008Br-LO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 May 2009 10:56:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-fx0-f169.google.com ([209.85.220.169]:47594) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1M1iYF-0001hh-7Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 May 2009 10:56:51 -0400 Original-Received: by fxm17 with SMTP id 17so177280fxm.42 for ; Wed, 06 May 2009 07:56:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=0/XfmY2sJMrbpj3NzjYkitbXmejjMBUF26CGam+hTNg=; b=DoRugQ1zCiJiihKJOIc+qiPzd/5SH00Zab90sIF7D8b4dT7PZps2fQimqsV9aw2tnP TRS32MsymzIAzlg54Hb0mT3ymDpYWN9HAr7mhVqiJa0INzTwCh71KKkxFr8Llrnhrzsw BRzCoNqi1geKXMxh/wclx1A4mxeBdx5R/MTu8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ow8Vgss4J0FAemoW4qgOa5FSoZlis2LHOf5hiFSv7iOzHVEIM/eh4BtmRmOU0NykLN 2T+jPOoOwtK0mkDOHXznFuIyCOx+xRVDpTFzbsYHLd42yesMt+trxSZe485ytgNQy5eI +eP+cPzJlMg2qdcm4aNkmWwEVjBqItsFzPAxY= Original-Received: by 10.223.123.129 with SMTP id p1mr1018437far.29.1241621806232; Wed, 06 May 2009 07:56:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <46023.130.55.118.19.1241621533.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:110727 On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 4:52 PM, Davis Herring wrote: >> Should it do that? > > Is there a reason that it shouldn't? =C2=A0(In other words, what is the b= ug you > are reporting?) =C2=A0Speculating wildly, I suppose you might want it to = be > UTF-8 now that we're using Unicode. =C2=A0But unless emacs-mule is causin= g a > problem, it's probably better to keep it if only for compatibility with > older Emacsen. Yes, I was thinking along those lines. Just wondered if anyone noticed and thought about it.