From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "C-c C-c" binding for "submission" in server edit buffers Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:32:09 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87eivvxryg.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87iql79jmm.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1239733971 1869 80.91.229.12 (14 Apr 2009 18:32:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:32:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Miles Bader , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 14 20:34:10 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LtnS9-0003yG-6j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 20:33:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54602 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LtnQk-00036i-HJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:32:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LtnQg-00035y-Cd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:32:18 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LtnQb-00034n-Su for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:32:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58103 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LtnQb-00034k-Nh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:32:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f215.google.com ([209.85.218.215]:34282) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LtnQa-0005oi-4a; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:32:12 -0400 Original-Received: by bwz11 with SMTP id 11so2816953bwz.42 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:32:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=jD1d5a4ylamyB723pdvAchT3K4nRhrSTVZ4QCkcWtSU=; b=WT6cXGnJxDj6d2YrQ0nEvW3c/jq3tEHS+eGwi8BnWuAQNaoKqbPyx6BjBCgpLhlxSB L05uHH8kQYIRe8r0rISXu7I7mjaXVQfFtiTz7RPxFc3sz2RCO4WDwM+XOiWu7flNvz75 pTEEscidfFfJHUeZh1IQTmTB5BIaNAT9Rln00= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Ym793cgLMQxm9pgOWskFZ7c7VaFIS/e7IzV8K6+vBh4Ja6JqIi1FpQwetTmRisEVJP Uz3sxyjqnDSffYtLuEVWdeMK66g6ENSjQrRGpc953BohGUok3SrwGDE96sgaHuoMkYYp PX8+ZYG9HD1YuJ85XUwVWfdOP7MwMEEA7UKIg= Original-Received: by 10.223.113.199 with SMTP id b7mr2112032faq.82.1239733929338; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 11:32:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87iql79jmm.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:110276 Archived-At: On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Chong Yidong wrote= : > Stefan Monnier writes: > >> Maybe a global binding rather than a minor-mode binding would be less >> problematic (since minor-mode bindings take precedence over major-mode >> bindings). > > I think it would be very confusing to bind C-c C-c to server-edit > globally. =C2=A0That keybinding is used in so many places that adapting i= t > for server-edit is simply impractical, because then it may not be clear > to the user what C-c C-c does in a given context. What is the reason for not using C-x k which normally kills the buffer?