From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.windows Subject: Re: Emacs-w32 Bug-Reports for 23.0.92.1 LENNART (patched) [WAS: 23.0.60; yanking raw-text into mini-buffer causes crash] Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 23:41:19 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1238794902 17880 80.91.229.12 (3 Apr 2009 21:41:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 21:41:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-emacs-windows@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: MON KEY Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 03 23:43:00 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LprAA-0002OV-II for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 23:42:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33738 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lpr8m-0001Xq-Cg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:41:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lpr8h-0001XV-2t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:41:27 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Lpr8c-0001XC-Gs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:41:26 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35781 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Lpr8c-0001X9-D2; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:41:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-bw0-f167.google.com ([209.85.218.167]:61427) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Lpr8b-0002XV-T4; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:41:22 -0400 Original-Received: by bwz11 with SMTP id 11so1165259bwz.42 for ; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 14:41:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=pj7xE4Mbz3OOecdJkLkSCYZyF9cRnZDIfsZk/cNEvqY=; b=Yn0/SQ9vxNO5HLtHTyOK/mTZ0n1yvtw3BUjgyRpIjcMraOIQJPGD+9MDjgEesVw62L q/ftwWO/Q2tTFbIolGwSNhgwdMeBuqKhPmaiUKArmK55d3U5rxVp1v1gASRz0fBgWiyt S2f80nO1buWMiLrvOy35qT6az8wkPSZ1Ur1Wo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=XmAEekPAF0UGtIzsYRQRHUxLkHwhVQNkdpuTbU1j72YOSJohvsRD+6jUye69EDkU3r JzVuAea/LpWe2tyeV/Z7Sv1abTXNwp9f+bxvLTUYoDanCx2BaPTC0p3mjWkE8FH5ULlL uE2/hMnV0kZ9fZ6DOoetvr/QZcdgdIIi06PVg= Original-Received: by 10.223.119.84 with SMTP id y20mr1508792faq.14.1238794880042; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 14:41:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:110046 gmane.emacs.windows:4249 Archived-At: Eh, sigh. Sorry for not removing the bug mail addresses. On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Lennart Borgman wrote: > On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 7:40 PM, MON KEY wrote: >> I recently screwed up a bug report sent to help-emacs-windows@gnu.org: >> =C2=A0"23.0.60; yanking raw-text into mini-buffer causes crash" >> by somehow clobbering the operative bug description and details . >> >> In the wake of this report, I have received 2 (two) separate >> pejorative emails "informing" about the use of >> help-emacs-windows@gnu.org for filing bug reports when using the >> Lennart build of GNU-Emacs for w32 (patched). In lieu of these emails >> I suspect of having stepped into someone else's dog fight. >> _Someone please FORMALLY CLARIFY the correct protocol for following situ= ation_ > > > I feel a bit guilty so please forward any pejorative emails to me ;-) > > I have tried to arrange bug reporting the best way I could but maybe I > have not been clear enough. If you are using the patched version to > send then it will go to help-emacs-windows@gnu.org (h-e-w) as you have > observed. In the beginning of the generated message there is this > notice: > > =C2=A0This is a bug report for the PATCHED Emacs+EmacsW32. > =C2=A0Please test the unpatched version of Emacs+EmacsW32 before reportin= g > =C2=A0if you can. If the bug is also in the unpatched version then > =C2=A0report from the unpatched version else report here. > > =C2=A0If it is very inconvenient for you to try the unpatched version, > =C2=A0but you believe the bug is not related to the patches then you > =C2=A0may change the address above to emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org > > I think this is a reasonable way to handle the difficulties with the > bug reports for the patched version I distribute. > > David, you are in charge of h-e-w, did we discuss this before? I have > forgotten. Since h-e-w is a low traffic list and those who use the > patched version might be interested in this list anyway I have > addressed the bug reports to this list. There are also very few bug > reports that are specific to the patched version. > >> On that older Lennart build: Help > Send Bug Report =3D=3D> >> Generates a bug-report *mail* buffer with a field; TO: >> help-emacs-windows@gnu.org >> >> I therefor accepted this as the desired (and presumably previously >> agreed upon) protocol. > > This is at least where I want you to send the bug report. > > >> Are the aforementioned behaviors of these Lennart builds incorrect? >> If so, _I_ am _NOT_ the only person whom needs to be politely informed >> of the correct means with which to file a bug report when using >> Lennart builds of Emacs-w32. > > No, we all need that help for our first bug report in a new situation ...= ;-) > > >> *** FWIW: The cruxt of _my_ user error involved me kill/pasting from >> Emacs' bug-report *mail* buffer into a gmail web-interface and hitting >> send without checking that everything was yanked/copied correctly. > > Did you notice that there is a little program called gAttach that can > make gmail:s web interface act as the default mail client on w32? >