From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: w32-pass-rwindow-to-system Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:12:05 +0100 Message-ID: References: <49772C9A.8020300@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1232576010 19190 80.91.229.12 (21 Jan 2009 22:13:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:13:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jason Rumney Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 21 23:14:41 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LPlLC-0003S6-6F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:14:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37297 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LPlJu-0007Mp-OM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:13:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LPlIv-00066r-SY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:12:09 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LPlIv-00065W-76 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:12:09 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56333 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LPlIu-000654-R1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:12:08 -0500 Original-Received: from yw-out-1718.google.com ([74.125.46.158]:21819) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LPlIr-0001ku-RG; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:12:06 -0500 Original-Received: by yw-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 9so1695178ywk.66 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 14:12:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ld1HHwWlgQqFU/I5YnX37uCms3VumH8ODn1VOb9vJrw=; b=hAdNf03Jph5GN8LfwBqMspg9Wty9VGThTXgGeu9O4Xl0l/8Cvs62xW8FQLQhCkCnfp XmYxja4IRF6Csi65tYIb8qgvLJCQf7266tjsgUOBoG21hFvDd7X8EWVcf570yo9UdA0G BsO6Lhm8eqbBm+3eF3fIS71JaNiJHH7oYLqyM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=A5O2oKETRYlSMSNgyBLpDrzGuXzDel91zrO3nNTuhKkzQQtA56qJJAnBM7WfNeQKHT hTIxaGnY/L40QrcwbcqWYQ19xw/G12UCWwH80iY3JUEAwONY+NWW4c4/V4cfokGTPCoR 1S606w5juHWmOw6YNvIUqlLcVKNbWmqjKnqk4= Original-Received: by 10.150.134.21 with SMTP id h21mr2558917ybd.199.1232575925345; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 14:12:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <49772C9A.8020300@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:108056 Archived-At: On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Jason Rumney wrote: > Lennart Borgman wrote: >> >> At the moment I do not have time to dig out that part. I have spent >> quite a lot of time trying to get this fix into Emacs, but the >> resistance has been too strong for the limited time I have so I have >> run out of time for this. (Feel free to grab the patch from my >> patches.) >> > > You have never once made the effort to separate out the bugfixes from your > extensive patch that modifies a number of unrelated aspects of Emacs > behaviour. Are you surprised that there is resistance when we always get > told "take it all or sort through it yourself"? I looked through what I wrote and maybe you are right, see this thread: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2008-01/msg01604.html As you can see in this last message there where quite a few things fixed there. I am not sure how to proceed. I think it all should go in one parcel. You may of course have comments on my coding style etc. Feel free to comment on that. Since this has been in use for 3 y now I think it could be considered rather stable. The best way to get the patch now is from the patch I upload for Emacs+EmacsW32. It is the files src/w32fns.c src/w32menu.c src/w32term.h w32-meta.el (new, not in the patch) The latest patch is from 2009-01-15. The patches are here http://ourcomments.org/Emacs/DL/EmacsW32/src/