From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: w32-pass-rwindow-to-system Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:48:57 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1232531352 9166 80.91.229.12 (21 Jan 2009 09:49:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:49:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: MON KEY , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 21 10:50:25 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LPZj6-0006pS-N7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:50:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41637 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LPZhp-0008Mi-GM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 04:49:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LPZhk-0008Km-Co for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 04:49:00 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LPZhj-0008Ka-Pj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 04:48:59 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35254 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LPZhj-0008KX-ME for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 04:48:59 -0500 Original-Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.155]:36366) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LPZhj-0004kV-9m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 04:48:59 -0500 Original-Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so1807107fgb.30 for ; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 01:48:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=F8gcfG8cautAx/glnRrZTrLtr0z5I1rDvD/PIcboQ2Q=; b=hV2902aLLw0x3RcI8+dAiq5WRmBmbqe98yfHym2syXm6jZd9ZJqCXlpa9Rj683rB4M RZBJGiiaQJeKV3Ocyi0zP8UmO8FJ1TYWSjjm4g4wp6qqYwFFysVNJ3Dp4Ivd//h5TVqG umi9pBoipfaURRidGlDcF1hnj+GH0FWACcbtA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=pfpTFg329Mk8k11AsmyZfWPISQgpdqZxzEKmkrudVECnrESLHDobUfWwu7yMVypjl0 13PiWoC4s9rx+wW2EhUsaOZBGnSPd6Dg+f5fkqmwDU1sFtaIic9jwUW81jsVMVOcvSTq CPcAcXM/+w+QSabWibDrZydX4u85RzkmvPI0U= Original-Received: by 10.86.68.2 with SMTP id q2mr1198780fga.3.1232531337602; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 01:48:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:108030 Archived-At: On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Juanma Barranquero wrote: > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 02:57, MON KEY wrote: > >> Is it normal/expected behavior for the w32 System to open 'Start' on >> vanilla lwindow rwindow key preses without a modifer? > > With w32-pass-[lr]window-to-system set to nil, pressing either Windows > key does not open the Start menu (while Emacs is the active app, of > course). This is not guaranteed according to MS documentation. With the patched version of Emacs+EmacsW32 this should work, but only if you follow the extra documentation there. Just setting w32-pass-[lr]window-to-system is not enough. >> System is: >> GNU Emacs 23.0.60.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2008-10-23 on >> LENNART-69DE564 (patched) > > Lennart's EmacsW32 has changes to the keyboard handling stuff. Does > happen to you with the non-patched version?