From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Undo-limit default Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 14:10:43 +0100 Message-ID: References: <873ah0n4xc.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <493BC963.3000907@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1228655465 26036 80.91.229.12 (7 Dec 2008 13:11:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 13:11:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "martin rudalics" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 07 14:12:10 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1L9JQa-0004C6-I2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Dec 2008 14:12:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46235 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L9JPP-0007H1-MN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Dec 2008 08:10:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L9JPK-0007CS-IW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Dec 2008 08:10:46 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L9JPK-0007BW-2v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Dec 2008 08:10:46 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34167 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L9JPJ-0007BJ-SQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Dec 2008 08:10:45 -0500 Original-Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.152]:2834) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L9JPJ-0005Fl-JB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Dec 2008 08:10:45 -0500 Original-Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so557301fgb.30 for ; Sun, 07 Dec 2008 05:10:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=8bwAQD4pDjrZepIrvozZ9jVMTSvXy/v6Rh3Xmu7O+Ao=; b=D3LEq2UI2pALAKk1O520QJvKv10SUY1IdMRqc+J64yrWa1Y5Sm6NrIXW5dSTIaRmUC cA7wcHIsGRKvrE7DdhLl1EwhQtdK0vTfPiZT9mQW7HyMhSj5JUV2DQOU3i7D6xhuLLxp slI3FlDEWFAYrZBjf9rtMf/7BB2W4cKhRWVQE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=aWJLNvn+CZcFyx8UEPGEUcNn/66v3pRJwOlMyHDOwWFfQZ2kWPewAK1mfu01FQZUa8 OZcr/nNYemIHjq9rNlGmH6zzy/TpJDDGEIqSIStWpEzwlIdbw6/GRjd+XLta4RbfpfXq CN1hN7JARv7usZuChNzdeGCQjQG784EQqQkMo= Original-Received: by 10.86.72.3 with SMTP id u3mr1961768fga.1.1228655443884; Sun, 07 Dec 2008 05:10:43 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.86.58.16 with HTTP; Sun, 7 Dec 2008 05:10:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <493BC963.3000907@gmx.at> Content-Disposition: inline X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:106648 Archived-At: On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 2:02 PM, martin rudalics wrote: > but I don't understand why we keep font-lock assigned properties (in > particular the completely useless 'fontified property) on the undo-list. > Here these usually account for more than 90% of all entries. I thought that the `fontified' property did not go into the undo-list. Are not the calls changing that property surrounded by macros that should prevent that? What major modes do you see this in?