From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Lennart Borgman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: line-move-visual never set to nil? Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:43:26 +0200 Message-ID: References: <18571.25125.311010.324079@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <87od4k1nj5.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <1F7E32D0-7C19-4950-94DB-F6CD33A56EB0@gmail.com> <6161f3180807290043l2b0cc1as85a338204687f183@mail.gmail.com> <87y73kbvz3.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_26709_26186639.1217342606651" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1217342668 29460 80.91.229.12 (29 Jul 2008 14:44:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 14:44:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: David Reitter , raman@users.sourceforge.net, Stefan Monnier , "Andrew W. Nosenko" , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Chong Yidong" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 29 16:45:17 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KNqRk-0001j3-9Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:45:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59297 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KNqQq-00061U-5e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:44:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KNqQI-0005cb-VU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:43:35 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KNqQH-0005b6-RZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:43:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=47507 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KNqQH-0005ae-Gb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:43:33 -0400 Original-Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.153]:29803) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KNqQD-00049h-Tc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:43:30 -0400 Original-Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so2324374fgb.30 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 07:43:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=QwO4b0x3kRDQNh9TPiCrVx5SPt1SX0lZ9ZBRSCsx0zs=; b=MPgqCOvJInPGv3ogLWAQKuR3q4zkWUcx8WnV1yS+zuOzp8QJvqh8f71bnL/eswmFwk CdN23qp+FMq7aF3Fy9DLhFxyUzILJnBaWRQmTsZIzZykgQ63nJqczb7fMpCoZVZgHx9v sP9W4l667mAfFiN18WCl1261ajsHrFePB6pPo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=rlSTEuhCISgLUAxB0sRQ5itjJqErFwogd/n4iu9yYdiLSjjBVyyC2uhomzXJ44qCpt kwyYWvUbA/+0/dgZHrvds2tjnTS/494NYvHyIJ3GT8RRpUMLZH2MbzyrgHfVHQEFxdVI WO75mOK3o19hF8pMF3ZUY9AY8LV5DQnDcZLZU= Original-Received: by 10.86.99.9 with SMTP id w9mr3753682fgb.70.1217342606639; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 07:43:26 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.86.66.2 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 07:43:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87y73kbvz3.fsf@stupidchicken.com> X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:101690 Archived-At: ------=_Part_26709_26186639.1217342606651 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 7/29/08, Chong Yidong wrote: > > "Andrew W. Nosenko" writes: > > > The biggest problem with "visual" line motion ... is that current > > defaults are beaks keybord macro. Just try to record some macro that > > uses up/down key having wrapped lines, change width of the > > window/frame and enjoy. :-( > > That's a good point. That's also why line-move doesn't try to scroll > tall images when executing a keyboard macro. Maybe line-move-visual > needs the same treatment, like in the following patch. WDYT? I do not understand what you mean here. Would not the easiest thing be to turn off visual line moving during macro recording and execution? ------=_Part_26709_26186639.1217342606651 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline
On 7/29/08, Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com> wrote:
"Andrew W. Nosenko" <andrew.w.nosenko@gmail.com> writes:

> The biggest problem with "visual" line motion ...  is that current
> defaults are beaks keybord macro.  Just try to record some macro that
> uses up/down key having wrapped lines, change width of the
> window/frame and enjoy. :-(

That's a good point.  That's also why line-move doesn't try to scroll
tall images when executing a keyboard macro.  Maybe line-move-visual
needs the same treatment, like in the following patch.  WDYT?
 
I do not understand what you mean here. Would not the easiest thing be to turn off visual line moving during macro recording and execution?

 
------=_Part_26709_26186639.1217342606651--