Re: Problems with whole buffer Custom functions.

[Kevin Rodgers <ihs_4664@yahoo.com>]

Juri Linkov wrote:
>>Of course, ordinary self-inserting characters _should_ self-insert in
>>editable fields.  But note that TAB still moves to next button or
>>editable field (I guess that list should now also include "link").
>>S-TAB also has its regular meaning, but the recently added M-TAB does
>>not, because it has another (completion related) meaning in editable
>>fields.
> 
> 
> I think this is mostly a documentation problem.  `C-h m' on a customization
> buffer suggests using `n' and `p' instead of better `TAB' and `S-TAB':
> 
>   Move to next button or editable field.     n
>   Move to previous button or editable field. p
>   Complete content of editable text field.   M-TAB

Would M-n and M-p be better?

> Adding `\\<widget-keymap>\' before first two lines above in the docstring
> of `custom-mode' to force displaying keybindings from `widget-keymap', the
> output of `C-h m' is still not good:
> 
>   Move to next button or editable field.     TAB
>   Move to previous button or editable field. M-TAB
>   Complete content of editable text field.   M-TAB
> 
> Note duplicate `M-TAB' for different contexts.

Would that go away if M-n and M-p were in front of (i.e. added later
than) TAB and M-TAB in widget-keymap?

-- 
Kevin Rodgers