From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Rodgers Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Buffer menu fix Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 15:41:51 -0600 Message-ID: References: <20050906095535.GC21497@www.trapp.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1126043348 9292 80.91.229.2 (6 Sep 2005 21:49:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 21:49:08 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 06 23:49:06 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EClI9-0002Uw-GH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 23:47:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EClMf-00044p-4s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 17:52:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EClLU-0003oz-Du for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 17:51:12 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EClLS-0003np-Bf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 17:51:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EClLS-0003nj-8g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 17:51:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1EClKM-0000ej-8T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 17:50:02 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EClEI-0001lL-1A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 23:43:46 +0200 Original-Received: from 207.167.42.60 ([207.167.42.60]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 23:43:46 +0200 Original-Received: from ihs_4664 by 207.167.42.60 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 23:43:46 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 36 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.167.42.60 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041105) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <20050906095535.GC21497@www.trapp.net> X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:42674 Archived-At: Tomas Zerolo wrote: > Can't you attach a doc-string to an anonymous function, like so? > > `lambda (e) > ,(concat "Sort buffer by " column) > ... Obviously you can include a doc string in a lambda form. The real question is, will Emacs do the right thing with it? It looks pretty good to me in Emacs 21: (documentation (lambda (foo) "*Grok FOO." (interactive "sGrok: ") (grok foo))) returns: "*Grok FOO." And given: (global-set-key "\C-cz" (lambda (foo) "*Grok FOO." (interactive "sGrok: ") (grok foo))) ,----[ C-h k C-c z ] | C-c z runs the command (lambda (foo) "*Grok FOO." (interactive "sGrok: ") (grok foo)) | which is an interactive Lisp function. | (anonymous FOO) | | *Grok FOO. `---- -- Kevin Rodgers