From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Choice of bug tracker Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 13:58:29 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87il9kksqz.fsf@dfreeman.email> <831qfrptiq.fsf@gnu.org> <57429221-d9be-5791-e975-b3539905e2f6@gutov.dev> <83a5udlj47.fsf@gnu.org> <87a5udk1co.fsf@posteo.net> <835y51kslv.fsf@gnu.org> <7a82c524-1aa1-e755-e377-673ebb107a44@gutov.dev> <83r0nok8s4.fsf@gnu.org> <83ledwk4xi.fsf@gnu.org> <76ecf629-a41a-f6e4-f661-2ef926326d6c@gutov.dev> <83zg2cias7.fsf@gnu.org> <83pm37ie54.fsf@gnu.org> <831qfmhyx3.fsf@gnu.org> <87pm36kqlg.fsf@posteo.net> <87il8yuk6q.fsf@yahoo.com> <87ttsfts92.fsf@localhost> <87r0njtrdl.fsf@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22548"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ihor Radchenko , brickviking Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 31 12:59:06 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qbfOD-0005ep-7o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 12:59:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qbfNu-0003nL-Ty; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 06:58:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qbfNj-0003lN-5l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 06:58:35 -0400 Original-Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qbfNg-0006js-QI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 06:58:34 -0400 Original-Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08A1A5C010A; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 06:58:32 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 31 Aug 2023 06:58:32 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gutov.dev; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t= 1693479512; x=1693565912; bh=rzlc4AterDiNQdNTWo1QIHEkrix+J/ySvvE yK9PK+Gc=; b=DcNLsNAdtqd0V295xQZlUcS5JNfSFpa2HmwNJ93SRxc3hb67teh 5KqcRg40NhqAMNFeHY1YV5HOB5OONHAQcOlni9rdrBqPYmaGjNrhAGP9W0vSvkTp rCCT6hAa+ifhQnFVD0OqjOfwuwUa4+PqsMWdOFvzwBX562imm4OsHSugL7GN/EY0 MQMpKNvp6P6pFT7Prz8ycsHTeyCPmhdbdBKb/eyxKEcog0AyL8Ai1tbleYJyb1Ee gxiAAecoPDSwwg94zpX0YX1pFC1PqumCyLgphrJ4gB+qltlieF6RFHXyJP17h2iP vE1u239JrDO01zngykbO/NFWsrHpKq4uieQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1693479512; x=1693565912; bh=rzlc4AterDiNQdNTWo1QIHEkrix+J/ySvvE yK9PK+Gc=; b=QTILAlqRID1x7wkjqPt9sBSg0x/bbfTyj3LOA43DrIUVFABtdYV yrS2EjdZuGMsDTtirjcNwqDFb0HoGams/OvsY2dlAfmwiOs0a0J1/Qh3LM6qpFRB CVukXiri4l7xHvbKmRnX1rkXwqDh0qpPvvbFI2n9qU4cEji2i3tMCkXPG/k1wGQk 5pibmnn3EXpk+4WHu27/nD4S1ilAbCx/NEvjExC7uXHYg5e5iBvuLPAU+59N9Fll x64UF9R9WZ0XiTqnqXIBia6VU5sBvIrMceP/7T+LM4cU9bnyJ/gYuo6GFjBuIAS3 S6LVv+3Psp0IId7LbYgwWvDcRz+RDciyr5Q== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedviedrudegtddgfeegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefkffggfgfuvfevfhfhjggtgfesth ejredttdefjeenucfhrhhomhepffhmihhtrhihucfiuhhtohhvuceoughmihhtrhihsehg uhhtohhvrdguvghvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeigfetveehveevffehledtueekie eikeeufeegudfgfeeghfdulefgfeevledvveenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecu rfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegumhhithhrhiesghhuthhovhdruggvvh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i0e71465a:Fastmail Original-Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 06:58:30 -0400 (EDT) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <87r0njtrdl.fsf@localhost> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.26; envelope-from=dmitry@gutov.dev; helo=out2-smtp.messagingengine.com X-Spam_score_int: -62 X-Spam_score: -6.3 X-Spam_bar: ------ X-Spam_report: (-6.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-3.478, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:309622 Archived-At: On 31/08/2023 13:53, Ihor Radchenko wrote: > brickviking writes: > >>>> I think so. I hope we will also consider the capacity for separate >>>> threads of discussion within an individual bug report a feature. >>> But isn't it discouraged in debbugs? >>> ... >> What if there was a hypothetical bug report that actually had a multiple >> number of things to address, but was only being reported under the original >> "bug" that the user reported on? That'd still be a good reason to be able >> to discuss #bugnum, #bugnum-feature1, #bugnum-feature2 and so on. I'm >> assuming that this is what debbugs is "discouraging"? > Yup. It feels "illegal" to open side discussions out of debbugs email > threads. Though, on the second thought, nothing should stop users from > branching off the thread into emacs-devel while dropping debbugs > address. The common approach is modern trackers is to create a new issue# for every sub-discussion, and leave a link to it in the parent one.