From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs rendering comparisson between emacs23 and emacs26.3 Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 18:43:13 +0200 Message-ID: References: <86tv2h2vww.fsf@gmail.com> <20200322123818.GB32470@ACM> <87eetk5swm.fsf@gnu.org> <20200326193128.GC14092@ACM> <86d08y4zsx.fsf@gmail.com> <83sghs7qdz.fsf@gnu.org> <7ee94ed4-7a11-90bd-df69-c0eeacaf191c@gmail.com> <835zeo7c92.fsf@gnu.org> <05de335b-383e-b32d-2e7e-e79192d364de@yandex.ru> <03981ead-3aca-c238-a9d0-88407ffae451@yandex.ru> <83wo745tw6.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="26506"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 Cc: cpitclaudel@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 28 17:43:51 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jIEYo-0006lj-VZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 17:43:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57178 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jIEYo-0003s7-1x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 12:43:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56105) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jIEYI-0003SL-LP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 12:43:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jIEYH-0000cr-Az for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 12:43:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-x335.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::335]:55175) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jIEYH-0000au-1R; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 12:43:17 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-x335.google.com with SMTP id c81so14882808wmd.4; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 09:43:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0zo0hiyc1ZmLm9jpEhjXX9BHzRPqRck4XiICi2m3RKQ=; b=SwhsxqdwKM2Z3CDqnFfA0vbBQlWIN5Dg5JTh5L8jAkwSFWycqxUKg8AD3e3ux+v0/q m3SyRprPGXP5nmj0EIo8shSY7yGLvPJ4GnkOaebDEdiSWy9LLdnUsGtgZ3GW0rtMUYaz A8Nc6YAEeA3oHwdOQzaR76snv2pXF12iT9dZA6sEdbnyEB4NX4cysnTgBfzVkIRnCO7m oXeOchIv3paNjVA2JjyeBxl1B7fIZU6R6Y/PAg2RBaJB32l6iHJaMzVXrgPMnZA+n6E9 4XZgDXSUEKhkEQU4uFLEu5yfdtOxXozMhKQZF9dbr6sIEfl6y5zp5HNxr5NEjcYy+K0H BC8g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=0zo0hiyc1ZmLm9jpEhjXX9BHzRPqRck4XiICi2m3RKQ=; b=L6UeeC1bAgr+XqY3wDaCwsOdnV0lKhHULZJOe8eWI8knrP5dgkBZhMXYWRIwpC/DtJ 3tOtiNQp1B6US5nxzd+Pn7za2Ct79eCSl3oUDHLB2dI3p3LDa/H84b9rB1GrJ6Eg1thU DYu3/0iAbQ0PMj0QZW8aZJqPbz1ILCLuI9voJPq7gFOwj+E9S6P2+O6wHAbCw9dF4W+0 XJO4GDv1LV6IWdvjU9qFlVcD3MjvaYMTUpdKcAcyXOoAElLIljLSIGkfqhaJLn5sQrlC Y6WiLa+cFD0qpQCWR/iaAW7ZFWmVeK1o1vZ+Rf+2uFQTro6pPqCNwDR074KHMdfz1uqQ n3CA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0q4c4Q8UekKPDDXkVpw4uuH0b0S2p/8KrmmQmP+H9Lahu73QTs z+IOr50jaLp0bhgLnYbRRsotxh/C X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vsWWcwTqSq0h+cFDMr4FsdkTEESdNY17O3r5ZwoqVmF/bHnytKoondnLEgHdmBbLymXdRKuXA== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:9c85:: with SMTP id f127mr4684219wme.91.1585413795318; Sat, 28 Mar 2020 09:43:15 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.2] ([66.205.73.129]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id f22sm20014064wmf.2.2020.03.28.09.43.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 28 Mar 2020 09:43:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83wo745tw6.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4864:20::335 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:245891 Archived-At: On 28.03.2020 18:25, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Dmitry Gutov >> Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2020 18:11:05 +0200 >> Cc:emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >> On 28.03.2020 18:10, Dmitry Gutov wrote: >>> On 28.03.2020 17:17, Clément Pit-Claudel wrote: >>>> Could it be used with Emacs 25's modules? >>> Apparently so:https://github.com/karlotness/tree-sitter.el >> Sorry, this one is more active: >> https://github.com/ubolonton/emacs-tree-sitter > Do any of those support font-lock? Because I think that's the context > of Clément's question about modules. Apparently they aim to replace it with a new specialized jit-highlighter: https://github.com/ubolonton/emacs-tree-sitter/issues/4 https://github.com/ubolonton/emacs-tree-sitter/pull/16 But that's not due to modules' limitations, but because of font-lock's limitations (allegedly).