From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug #25608 and the comment-cache branch Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 16:57:20 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20170202202418.GA2505@acm> <83lgtouxpf.fsf@gnu.org> <20170202215154.GB2505@acm> <83h94bvhzw.fsf@gnu.org> <20170205220045.GB2294@acm> <83d1es61li.fsf@gnu.org> <20170211232511.GA13712@acm> <20170212120553.GB3087@acm> <5dac24ba-a73e-b4f4-f595-30f86564b00a@yandex.ru> <20170212172900.GC3087@acm> <87mvdq97zy.fsf@jun.debian8.nb> <87a89q8ss1.fsf@jun.debian8.nb> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1486998522 4803 195.159.176.226 (13 Feb 2017 15:08:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 15:08:42 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.0 Cc: netjune@qq.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: zhanghj , Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 13 16:08:38 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cdIF2-0000sF-Sx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 16:08:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57572 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdIF8-0001DM-MC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 10:08:42 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42941) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdI4G-0000z5-58 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 09:57:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdI4C-0005GP-V8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 09:57:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-x232.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::232]:38467) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdI4C-0005Fy-OS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 09:57:24 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-x232.google.com with SMTP id r141so96021809wmg.1 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 06:57:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=i6mqJByJRHVFo52Ac/iC9aucD1RCXvAncTGZ8s4h3b0=; b=LVBduIwcxFuYC6/5mFaJOvAyAjbsGwlOP2wxHVM+LG14LZ3riBuOvoA51CpYwI/M+V K3yNAYtJJNSZaBtFrt+TNi1BLYVJ0n3rju4vf9KWbGwmW053Y7eZW6eav8M78T6DYQfK GSmykph1QRvNe7rG/wPSKBlwwMRnNxCCzurGDbEIYPhkWt7LJAKpasBZoRTwLRhtAMY4 NVDtinv01E4BYtTRiqgmaG+/mKfBTNNky1lCFJ2RvUWK+8OZQpjA9aj6EJ/mk/v2P/Qo f0WOHykOxsA0QN3aSMtjVdqHU4QDHn98+Gn4EexXMRIJnqI0Wu0vnMl4TOvHpE1DdzJt eF4g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=i6mqJByJRHVFo52Ac/iC9aucD1RCXvAncTGZ8s4h3b0=; b=h/68kxJJlDOxZBPf8fZtYlBOLPeVjXu1CeMbjRgbwmj3vI3NMkBQtHHTGi1mbsIWvP EuMNsQPk/t2LCF8XyAUSEOSBbqPsLikHJP6lU/VMghvF1VfKxBQ/v680wTcr+ALRPICu JipVtycWSXIsmAZ3L+6ZH28/LpexQrMtepC7I5wJT8VhCbVdrLn/BL9ZoWvryBo6vQ4o P2bmhkPe4Iu+yPmNYwkjmJ2nzCk+s4xuqkX/HYptzCDaGOyQgCEpKGDxcfWHRFc5Hrgn qBSKwnrKzw7+3jPfPHQPPwEpKJsFMcbF09Ve2E0fmDDTzgGM2Ofgq8EuMztNnYul7CSV gCzw== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39lpWlhodanQhyXjr2WUYhJfzaMOgYHof83chKtZucTT7gYpzdWKQwGfGgTpRcFj9A== X-Received: by 10.28.142.73 with SMTP id q70mr20058339wmd.3.1486997843318; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 06:57:23 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.133] ([212.50.99.193]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id i29sm14257355wrc.25.2017.02.13.06.57.21 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Feb 2017 06:57:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87a89q8ss1.fsf@jun.debian8.nb> Content-Language: en-US X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c09::232 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:212337 Archived-At: On 13.02.2017 09:16, zhanghj wrote: > If font-lock and syntax-ppss can be sub-buffer/island oriented, mmm-mode > will be easy to write. Unlikely. It will still require the modes to implement their stuff "correctly" (and that would still be hard to verify without using them in multi-mode context, I believe). Further, mmm-mode is not just about font-lock and indentation, though they are surely a big part of it.