From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Perry E. Metzger" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tick Reduction Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 16:01:45 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87bl2hyzca.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15490"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:95.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/95.0 Cc: emacs-devel To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 18 22:03:04 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mnoYg-0003oY-4A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 22:03:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38758 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mnoYe-0001uB-7b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 16:03:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33214) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mnoXV-0000PU-DM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 16:01:49 -0500 Original-Received: from hacklheber.piermont.com ([166.84.7.14]:55226) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mnoXT-000294-Ud for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 16:01:49 -0500 Original-Received: from snark.cb.piermont.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hacklheber.piermont.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 058D110D; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 16:01:46 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from [10.160.2.107] (jabberwock.cb.piermont.com [10.160.2.107]) by snark.cb.piermont.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A0212DF57A; Thu, 18 Nov 2021 16:01:45 -0500 (EST) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <87bl2hyzca.fsf@gnus.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=166.84.7.14; envelope-from=perry@piermont.com; helo=hacklheber.piermont.com X-Spam_score_int: -29 X-Spam_score: -3.0 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.084, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:279690 Archived-At: On 11/18/21 15:37, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > We could skip the tick removal on displays that don't support the > relevant faces, of course. Perhaps the right thing to start with would be to provide a customization that does this (i.e. turns on tick removal for displays with relevant faces), see how it looks for a while, and then, if everyone agrees it is better, switch the default? Perry