From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Adding icon sets to Emacs -- and next steps for icons.el Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 17:26:50 +0300 Message-ID: References: <310877950.2974437.1661344999220@mail1.libero.it> <83k06x6ajp.fsf@gnu.org> <562da430-1919-0370-8dd4-a33bdf5d000f@yandex.ru> <87zgftwxo4.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34558"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.1 Cc: Eli Zaretskii , angelo.g0@libero.it, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 24 16:28:36 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oQrMy-0008pj-MO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 16:28:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49070 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oQrMx-0004SD-GB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 10:28:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56300) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oQrLd-0003VE-6r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 10:27:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-x42c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::42c]:40913) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oQrLb-0004ZR-G5; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 10:27:12 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id h5so20182585wru.7; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 07:26:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :sender:from:to:cc; bh=eJ2J/5yUV0bsU3vYkSkYOAy8iP/Gl6p/D+8N2NHZckg=; b=hwtX5fB5Nkc44bC7Idy/fqwuvjDgkKZwMSsebOFGVpfBfSnLKeQK7dQfDBLzZ5DCK+ 4dhTEQpjUp6yDkOB/O4OymDLAnu1u8A/32S/E0Bnq0UupLXKYQq5lSHbc2ib92O+vjJK /r5qGUMMIf5V1iAbOkC1VT+a/IXThCqQgEVd8LcVC9wiI9DV8Y64cy4rcto0yn6+4WGm nMz3/NVWJ+y/UgJ5+Yglm4HNv1S509KXj2w16Ajq7AIKNWXRW7YD5rWFYQ+1UmKl8ywG ZzmiPgY2CCEVdnl8wGQ2uLMfYa6VLKO7na+HYKWYmIU6+J1rqXT7sYnz4XGkjQphlgLG TJ7g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :sender:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=eJ2J/5yUV0bsU3vYkSkYOAy8iP/Gl6p/D+8N2NHZckg=; b=GXinF28YWP2tb4vrliG8+3EgylZ+hg4PA/rnc/zbBIbeXYREb3vHCB48pYImSuh343 q6mJ04fcsns/zhjUQauFUqUXyLeXV4mcZrRcasGEJLUxXIuk+20atF0SJqsShSvDW7jB 9BuDgarb17kcqKaLL/OrDW9BW0cQv14mDnlbbub/t35NB53KDmRVykmBsDJLQrJCgLe3 joWrflWHO8qL7W5Cjx5MYpK+rC9cKIsn+oDZZdYTjQoB+99PZ6XfnJRyzSQoFAGH2O4d dYpbWzhB8LEE3/pw5g0DF+rfluVfiKGIZuu2lF2IUHlCBTgcYZWrydT75Z0vR+xWeYKl QbhA== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo2qdGnxdkFLZj9ev9OgLlpGvRrZ7YTiyIP3ZY6tfwXY9ItvsI4H uXk4ytDtB+yZ+QqOWdMRkWU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR70LbO5Bxl6mUl+s1jK3CjrG+hgKJUuXB5xw8OWFh18elCMC+vYOBQBgPIkm/r/bI6HkRPOLA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1789:b0:225:7557:94f9 with SMTP id e9-20020a056000178900b00225755794f9mr744983wrg.635.1661351213069; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 07:26:53 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id d12-20020adff2cc000000b002238ea5750csm21233666wrp.72.2022.08.24.07.26.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 24 Aug 2022 07:26:52 -0700 (PDT) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <87zgftwxo4.fsf@yahoo.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::42c; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x42c.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -14 X-Spam_score: -1.5 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:294032 Archived-At: On 24.08.2022 16:58, Po Lu wrote: > Dmitry Gutov writes: > >> OTOH, black-and-white has much higher odds of being compatible with an >> arbitrary color themes/desktops/toolkits, so it should be a good >> choice just by being neutral. Unlike the previous icon set which only >> really fit the default GNOME 2 palette. > Actually that's not quite true. The previous icon set shows up with > decent contrast on top of any background, since all the icons are a > solid block of color. "decent contrast" is a fairly low bar.