From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jim Porter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: esh-proc test failures Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2022 20:18:36 -0700 Message-ID: References: <166036758418.2203.8730240669199078524@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20220813051305.6667BC09BFE@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <87o7wmg0nx.fsf_-_@gnus.org> <30a7e3aa-ad52-325f-4fcd-528aade4a339@gmail.com> <838rng9kes.fsf@gnu.org> <837d2zae3m.fsf@gnu.org> <83v8qj8a2y.fsf@gnu.org> <83v8qj6iay.fsf@gnu.org> <40db52f2-86f1-3e86-fbca-80a8be09ee66@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21300"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 30 05:20:42 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oSrnp-0005Fl-KK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 05:20:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35018 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oSrno-0005EM-67 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 23:20:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34542) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oSrlz-0004X9-3l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 23:18:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pg1-x532.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::532]:38728) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oSrlx-00018u-FC; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 23:18:42 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pg1-x532.google.com with SMTP id r22so9480332pgm.5; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 20:18:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version :date:message-id:references:cc:to:from:subject:from:to:cc; bh=msHaqFo+zrqtU7F9iYKG7SNrYjkObmCQbSgVYcjrEtY=; b=RuNRMkUYTHtvbiHGgnNrvKETez2Zew5aolMgL0acXSZ5Lts7opQm55de9xKRemIiWP 4WKZZFig5kiv1KklDCvuEIpqiESZdFt0psTQ85ooVkOvTEBshId+PicYlu8FyATN4BNJ bbFcXbVa7gOYqBWwhpfoW2YpmXa9ggUPjCr0aikFHzBNzKwPaS08+oP+VJKzue1bS4JD l0OmWtfZHLvNM1OaAH//UAsbxqqzcQRTDzAnatNNVYi2BDJBHVFX8iDb2OUKU9NViH+Q voKUQlxwW96y9Ww2Px6iLPiClx4yWHv6Xpv7NcHHpmRC7pOApgFslCeyTKSyVAo3M1QE 92KA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version :date:message-id:references:cc:to:from:subject:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc; bh=msHaqFo+zrqtU7F9iYKG7SNrYjkObmCQbSgVYcjrEtY=; b=BBLIR5PWm8CRwBDyJnd6mG20/1q5xNnKIQdSZJaOnbum47zqMPv1CjxN4VlNFRHgF5 /7V53bsa6mJp4idoC4rEQfHuZzekdwmNfgLvz0HB81qNC1y7uSgZNhBBLD1o/rtPvT7e KqeBobEuEryfG+BWvOvMtExEJD2N3/6VvWYaLfuImsMlfoNFP79doeJiEJS1x4QjwPDs XfZuG7d0c61i1W66SXEQqIkYu0+DZnlAzFLtJOUbnZav6iWKEiijmvRyfEECWUwBpPi0 dju0OenQQi7kEV+s4UqE1JgVxkIO9ZztUubOUpTSGgdY4725U48gDcvyFptrbEgC6IsV jgGg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo37hngQqh28IbQMGJgmuCiBgvwwzqrUv41sT9iV/foXc8ugZSkT kiapteDJWc5dFvPmyZ5SfrEboN7lTnI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR5WVIeXaMp7cXIgRpxJlPNEHatWxPrcrrZoyGB6/IHzJWW57KgoLHSoOnYAuPP6PTxhKdb7uQ== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9193:0:b0:536:62e6:1a84 with SMTP id x19-20020aa79193000000b0053662e61a84mr19434124pfa.20.1661829518065; Mon, 29 Aug 2022 20:18:38 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.1.2] (cpe-76-168-148-233.socal.res.rr.com. [76.168.148.233]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id r18-20020a17090b051200b001f8c532b93dsm7553631pjz.15.2022.08.29.20.18.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 29 Aug 2022 20:18:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <40db52f2-86f1-3e86-fbca-80a8be09ee66@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::532; envelope-from=jporterbugs@gmail.com; helo=mail-pg1-x532.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:294321 Archived-At: On 8/23/2022 9:38 AM, Jim Porter wrote: > Then I think we're in agreement, since that's what Eshell currently > does. (My sentence above was just trying to say that, *somehow*, Eshell > needs to be sure that the relevant process is informed of the error. > Delivering a signal is how Eshell does it now, and I think that's ok.) Merged as f9250c5ebc1730bf3bed4382549433f52f7ef9ca. Hopefully this fixes EMBA; if there are any further issues anyone encounters, just let me know.