From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: Emacs terminology (not again!?) [was: Apologia for bzr] Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 06:48:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: References: <877gact76s.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1389278966 20505 80.91.229.3 (9 Jan 2014 14:49:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 14:49:26 +0000 (UTC) To: =?iso-8859-1?B?UGVyIFN0YXJi5GNr?= , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 09 15:49:32 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W1GvK-0006et-17 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 15:49:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52393 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W1GvJ-0003xj-K2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 09:49:29 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50050) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W1Guv-0003Vk-48 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 09:49:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W1Gum-0004am-Ig for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 09:49:05 -0500 Original-Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:23971) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W1Gum-0004ah-AM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 09:48:56 -0500 Original-Received: from acsinet22.oracle.com (acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id s09EmsVp027951 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 9 Jan 2014 14:48:55 GMT Original-Received: from aserz7021.oracle.com (aserz7021.oracle.com [141.146.126.230]) by acsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s09EmrtY024160 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 9 Jan 2014 14:48:53 GMT Original-Received: from abhmp0005.oracle.com (abhmp0005.oracle.com [141.146.116.11]) by aserz7021.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s09EmrMd012535; Thu, 9 Jan 2014 14:48:53 GMT In-Reply-To: X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.8 (707110) [OL 12.0.6680.5000 (x86)] X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 156.151.31.81 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:167915 Archived-At: > users can get the impression that Emacs is not for them because it's weir= d. > If they in just the first half hour of using Emacs meet several such thin= gs > they may conclude that working with Emacs will continue to be like this; > now and then it will turn out that it doesn't work as "expected" and that > there are new names for everything, etc. Why not use That Other Editor > that some other people suggested instead? Why not, indeed? Problem solved. At ease; false alarm. Circulez ; il n'y a rien a voir. (And _you_ are not using That Other Editor why? Did you perhaps spend more than 1/2 hour learning This Old Editor?)