From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master ff4de1b: Fix quoting style in Lisp comments Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 16:07:17 +0300 Message-ID: References: <20210912165141.9491.52637@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20210912165143.5BC1E20A5E@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <47d6e9a6-f334-eda9-2e08-0a946e51fc4a@yandex.ru> <83v934emk7.fsf@gnu.org> <87sfy8d7oo.fsf@gnus.org> <9194fc93-fb9c-000f-a35a-321ddd259893@gmx.at> <8735q5yi63.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83czp9by3s.fsf@gnu.org> <05cbffe0-f89b-ff54-64f5-cd1d11bac4f5@yandex.ru> <831r5pbt7j.fsf@gnu.org> <83wnnhacy4.fsf@gnu.org> <40937e22-994f-466c-87be-4f70a522118a@yandex.ru> <83pmt790cz.fsf@gnu.org> <41b90a60-04ab-8ef1-24ee-ac30d39640aa@yandex.ru> <837dff8niq.fsf@gnu.org> <8a9a14b9-c562-8813-daea-28108f3173f3@yandex.ru> <8335q38ktr.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18667"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0 Cc: rms@gnu.org, stefan@marxist.se, juri@linkov.net, rudalics@gmx.at, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 17 15:09:18 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mRDcE-0004fs-7P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 15:09:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38622 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mRDcD-0004Gq-1X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 09:09:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48224) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mRDaT-0002sB-0d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 09:07:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-x32d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::32d]:35433) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mRDaR-0000b9-1m; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 09:07:28 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id z184-20020a1c7ec1000000b003065f0bc631so9954638wmc.0; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 06:07:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NjYknqjqtLujnBmspLK4pMBLo8ct8J7D4y4VD+5cMKI=; b=Zd2p84GDPwzLIW5Q1nRNN56uTEKSdu3sHjzjwqtneAEhHh5czGDG4HLIpPR+XA22vh tG77H+53LHnEWGUr/YlSS3g+ShD3ZCjRQ5g4C5k2OBxDgu5y7smE4f+vz6W8Eft2cMNI mIevAUYvWNRAvnkUQAc8Ca6gAs1Ow8j7cWwaK1NJtAPrKzM3/UU9gl83Evf0FVU31nsV jvwS6DLkVrwDnY5bTMKJ0R0IKjRyoUl11VGstGK8Jw5/cgwKaPZaFE5jltWPRvYolk4H Er257/zd3OtL6jbPj6wrFX4+QlZP9Pdk+SRcrURegjZiheGGpuboP0kwxsTYMU8O/p9n rqdQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=NjYknqjqtLujnBmspLK4pMBLo8ct8J7D4y4VD+5cMKI=; b=6y5CzUIK8RpP8yBDM8L7SdLf86nHyi66kDexp1U8U+3YDNFqSs7Zj7xY7LccAD8WsT qxVh67xZRJDcBy2Ji8Os4LRWc3bVykBz2tpYG5W5hzfOjxbvPv8IRvkWLE9Ym+97atwC NNCQfCi9Coa7blbjzl4nQqH3C2HAJ9hsVxeF0V5CKkhrvXS3yeFpP7pbA8SMy7ZyLAGw aD5LyAVqZNfKcQdSR29IFeDEPE60jmgGnOGzD+UzOtRm8CXR3N1AaqMfZblZvWySlKpC nbKfxvLxyCUv587lW2T07hIEMkKOVQCHhi8sLua2doOQ+l4vAV+ztaSVz0Q/OWZagF4F piaA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53222dn/3MfbrJnUeXXBktLmPrWsrk8qEWTN3LsKA3hf/3hf17Ko UqpjkfGz01FvcmuTMknZe6UN9mwwH6s= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy9iYA0XJ2SDo0aq7TxPqnvjBONI3y1JGXi65i5B0v+AM/WOcNIFx7XOKWrnypubzAkkoxqzg== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:234a:: with SMTP id j71mr10192577wmj.11.1631884044862; Fri, 17 Sep 2021 06:07:24 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id k4sm6595418wrv.24.2021.09.17.06.07.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 17 Sep 2021 06:07:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8335q38ktr.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::32d; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x32d.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -29 X-Spam_score: -3.0 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.0 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, NICE_REPLY_A=-1.488, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:274870 Archived-At: On 17.09.2021 15:09, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Cc: rms@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, stefan@marxist.se, >> juri@linkov.net, rudalics@gmx.at, larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org >> From: Dmitry Gutov >> Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 14:25:31 +0300 >> >>> How many are "en masse"? We have less than a dozen people claiming >>> they want `..' back, that's hardly a "masse" in my book. >> >> I don't see anybody concur with your stance in this particular >> discussion, and if you search the old one, I think it was mostly Paul >> (?), and even he was really arguing toward something different, in a >> different context as well (plain text files). > > It doesn't matter. This is a decision we already made, so just saying > you don't like it is not good enough. We need a much stronger reason > to reverse previous decisions. The cost of backtracking is low, so yes, if people even simply say "we don't like it", it should be changed. I've listed particular reasons as well, but what does it matter: you ignore those parts of messages. >>> This one isn't, because we have been using it for many moons now. >>> Some of it is practically impossible to undo, because it's in Git >>> commit log messages. >> >> Again, look at this discussion: nobody is disputing the format of log >> messages. > > Not true. Nobody in *this discussion*. People being casually careless is nothing new, OTOH. > If you look at the commit log messages, even the latest > ones done today, you will see that almost everyone disputes that part. This is orthogonal to this discussion. Please don't derail it.